Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2014/Serotonin and emotion

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Low serotonin levels don't cause depression[edit source]

This article may be of interest: http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2014/09/13/low-serotonin-levels-dont-cause-depression/ Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tips and feedback[edit source]

Hey! I have some tips and feedback for you;

- Firstly I have edited your chapter by placing indents at the beginning of each new paragraph as that is APA formatting. Just copy and paste the syntax i placed at the beginning of a new paragraph and paste in when you start new paragraphs!

- APA formatting also requires you to caption picture starting with 'figure' followed by the number of figure (italicized) and then a caption. for example i copied this from my chapter;

Figure 4."Eating a three-ounce cucumber is like drinking three ounces of water, but better," (Goldman, 2011, p.1)]]

- Also I added a table of contents because I noticed yours was missing!

- lastly, I will just suggest that it might be interesting and more engaging if you incorporate a quiz or other interactive material for readers to engage in.

I know you haven't finished yet, but i hope this helps!!!

Good luck!

Brookelouise23 (discusscontribs) 06:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)brookelouise23Brookelouise23 (discusscontribs) 06:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a few edits[edit source]

Hi there,

This chapter looks great, I really enjoyed reading it. I have made a few minor edits such as: adding links to wiki pages on some terminology, and some sentences. I really liked the two tables you had it made things easy to read and sort of like a conclusion of the important factors.

Lucy90 (discusscontribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation – well done!

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. A well designed and organised presentation which provides an excellent overview of the role serotonin plays in emotion. Logical flow between concepts is clearly demonstrated as is linkage to, and integration of, research and theory – very impressive. The presentation is comprehensive and covers quite a lot of territory without trying to do too much. The inclusion of myths or fact/fiction in regards to serotonin and food was an interesting addition. Perhaps an overview slide or initial explanation of the presentation's structure would be helpful to the viewer. In-text referencing to match the end of text reference list would also improve the presentation. A great summary slide was provided at the end of the presentation.

Communication[edit source]

  1. Clear communication of ideas using voice and image was displayed. The presentation was engaging and displayed good use of illustrative examples. Slowing the pace at which the content was delivered (read aloud) and using more images could improve the presentation.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. The presentation had clear picture and audio quality and demonstrated effective use of PowToon to communicate ideas. The presentation also had a clear element of professionalism about it. No copyright license is provided for the presentation. A link is provided from the book chapter to the presentation, however, the link provided from the presentation to book chapter needs checking (it doesn’t directly link to the actual book chapter). A comprehensive reference list is provided.

RenaeLN (discusscontribs) 02:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter.
  2. For more feedback, see these copyedits and comments below.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Theory is well covered.

Research[edit source]

  1. Research is well covered.
  2. When describing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
  3. Some statements were unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression is very good.
    1. The quality of written expression could be improved (e.g., where clarification templates have been added to the page).
  2. Layout
    1. Images are used, but captions are needed.
  3. Learning features
    1. Some links to Wikipedia and/or Wikiversity articles were added as external links - these should be changed to interwiki links
    2. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement.
  4. Spelling
    1. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize -> hypothesise)
  5. APA style
    1. Add APA style captions to tables and figures.
    2. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)
    3. The reference list is not in full APA style.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 13:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]