Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2014/Nomophobia and emotion

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall Overall, this was a fascinating topic, and it was a pleasure to watch this presentation, well done. Structure and content There was a nice effort to include theory and research, and the flow worked well. For improvement, include mention of more theories and perhaps a higher emphasis on research studies. Communication Overall, Jing was used to great effect, and the presentation was relevant and engaging. For improvement, the use of a case study or real life example might help to further engage the viewer Production quality The presentation quality was sound, well done. Relevant link, image refs and licensing info must also be included, thus this presentation likely violates copyright law. Courtney.Bruce (discuss • contribs) 03:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an interesting, informative overview of nomophobia and its emotional affects. For more feedback, see my copyedits and comments below. Theory Theory is well covered, particularly given that this is a relatively new area. Research Research is well covered, particularly given that this is a relatively new area. Written expression Written expression was generally very good, but appeared to lack proofreading. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences. Learning features The text could become more interactive by including interwiki links and more images. Spelling, grammar and proofreading There many instances of double-spaces instead of single-spaces. In other places, a space is missing (e.g., driving(Webster, 2014)). There are some repeated words (e.g., mobile phone phone) APA style Check APA style for in-text citations e.g., (Butt, & Phillips , 2008) -> (Butt & Phillips , 2008) The reference list is in basic APA style; it needs italics and removal of issue numbers for seriated journals.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)