Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2014/Firesetting motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hello there!! What an interesting topic!!! I had a read and I noticed that you did not include some in-text references. I copy and paste one of them but you have many to check. For instance, how do you know this?: Firesetting usually occurs in secret and it is hard for researchers to collect data. Good luck!!!! --U3074414 (discusscontribs) 00:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there. I think your topic is going to be very interesting!

I thought this document on Arson produced by the Australian institute of criminology may be useful. (Understanding criminal behaviour is kind of a hobby of mine). http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/A/1/8/%7BA18209AF-C67E-4E5E-9FCD-D5413DCA4686%7Dti236.pdf

Also, I can't tell much from your outline, so I'm not sure if you planning on covering this or not. But the role of "hero syndrome" in arson is very interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero_syndrome

Furthermore, the Macdonald Triad of violent behaviour (& fire setting) is also a interesting take on arson and serial killers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macdonald_triad

I hope this is helpful! :)


Laney3691 (discusscontribs)



Hi there again!

Your finished product is great! Every time I thought "you should talk about this" in the next paragraph you do! It’s easy to read, in-depth, and set out well. Your introduction is absolutely great.

The only edits I would suggest are:

At the end of "historical perspectives" I would just add a sentence saying the modern theories are very different. This will also help link to your next section.

Also, you images need to APA formatted. eg. Figure 1: blah blah blah.

Lastly, under "gender" you say a common motive for female firesetting is "re-housing". What is re-housing exactly?

Other than that, looks great. Great chapter.


Best of luck! Laney3691 (discusscontribs)



Great topic[edit source]

Hi - I am doing a chapter on shoplifting motivation and have decided to focus on juveniles and thought it may be helpful to provide you with some info I have come across in regards to theories surrounding criminal behaviour. I focussed on self-efficacy theory, deterrence theory and the theory of planned behaviour. I have used a case study throughout attempting to explain the theories using a 'typical' teenage boy caught shoplifting. I think the use of the case study has helped explain relatively difficult concepts to a layperson and suggest you could do the same. I have listed a few references which may help you if you choose to go down a similar path:

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Cottle, C. C., Lee, R. J., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(3), 367-394.

Richards, K. (2009). Juveniles' contact with the criminal justice system in Australia: AIC monitoring reports 07. Australian Government, Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from www.aic.gov.au

The Australian Institute of Criminology website was really helpful, I have listed a report they released on statistics of juvenile offending which you may find useful in terms of stats related to arson. I hope this was helpful. Good luck :) U3030139 (discusscontribs) 10:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

book chapter[edit source]

Hi there, This is a really interesting topic and your chapter is easy to read with lots of good information CheersSoneill90 (discusscontribs) 03:33, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

Overall, this is a wonderfully delivered presentation. Great job!

Structure and content[edit source]

The structure of this presentation is clear and the flow is logical. Important content is nicely selected. Theory and research are very nicely integrated throughout, giving the presentation good academic quality. The use of headlines in the first section of the presentation is a great idea. Some illustrative examples were used throughout.

Communication[edit source]

Communication is excellent. The visual component of this presentation is engaging and cleverly constructed. The voice-over is well-paced, with intonation and pauses where necessary. An minor area for improvement could be to more closely match the visuals and audio towards the beginning of the presentation. At times it was difficult to focus on both.

Production quality[edit source]

The production quality is very good - well done! The audio is clear, but perhaps slightly too quiet. The visuals are clear and have a professional feel. A link to the book chapter is provided. Copyright licence information is correctly cited.

ShaunaB - Talk


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an outstanding chapter. For more feedback, see my copyedits and comments below.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Theory is particularly well covered and integrated, in a readable and interesting way.
  2. Examples are used to illustrate the theories.

Research[edit source]

  1. Indepth knowledge of relevant research is evident and discussion of research evidence is well integrated.
  2. When describing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. The chapter is very well written, making it interesting and informative.
  2. The chapter benefits from a well developed Overview and Conclusion.
  3. Layout
    1. Tables and/or Figures were used effectively.
  4. Learning features
    1. Some links to Wikipedia and/or Wikiversity articles were added as external links - these should be changed to interwiki links
    2. Quizzes are used effectively to review and test knowledge.
  5. Spelling, grammar and proofreading is excellent.
  6. APA style
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)
    2. Apply italics to the reference list.
    3. Remove issue numbers for seriated journal references.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:45, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]