Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Self-esteem

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi, I saw you were doing Self-Esteem, I thought it would be good to do the difference between Self-esteem and Self-confidence if you were still looking at adding information. It might be too late, but I thought it might be something to discuss. Goodluck :)--Christine.DW (discusscontribs) 08:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Christine, thanks for your suggestion :) I probably won't go into any detail on self confidence because there will be another person covering that topic for the book, but will be including a link to it from my page! Goodluck finishing up your chapter :) --Jetlyn Payne (discusscontribs) 10:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matt's contributions[edit source]

Headings[edit source]

Hey Jetlyn, I've given you some headings which should give you a good place to start. Matt U3067894 (discusscontribs) 16:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible layouts for sections and possible opening statement and focus questions[edit source]

I added a few suggestions as to how you could work a few of those possible sections :) I also added a possible opening statement that you could fit into your overview in some form if you wanted. Also proposed a few focus questions to get you thinking about what direction you might want to take U3067894 (discusscontribs) 16:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Matt! I will definitely take your suggestions on board, most of my work is in a draft in microsoft word. So I'll format it out tonight :) --Jetlyn Payne (discusscontribs) 07:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High self esteem[edit source]

Maybe you could add a section regarding the affect of a high self esteem or an "inflated ego"? Because Im sure controlling a high self esteem can improve life, as self esteem affects your interactions with peers, and those that have an inflated ego tend to have issues with relationships and peers through their interactions. Just a thought :-) U3052304 (discusscontribs)

Thankyou for your suggestion, will definitely take it on board :) --Jetlyn Payne (discusscontribs) 10:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

This is a beautifully presented chapter, with some really important content - fantastic!

Theory[edit source]

Theories are well identified and a sound understanding of the concepts is displayed. While the coverage is acceptable, the chapter can be strengthened by including a little more detail and research support. Well done for the focus on practical application.

Research[edit source]

The research presented in this chapter is explained in sufficient detail for the target audience. It is also used well to support to position of the chapter. To improve further, include some evidence of critical evaluation.

Written expression[edit source]

A really well presented and structured chapter. APA referencing was well done. The layout was appealing and clear. Providing links throughout would be beneficial. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.


Overall[edit source]

Structure and content[edit source]

Research is very well integrated. Theory could have been explored more thoroughly. The flow is very clear and logical.

Communication[edit source]

Verbal communication is clear, confident and engaging. The design of the presentation is also very engaging. The practical focus towards the end is a particular highlight, however the presentation could have been included more illustrative examples throughout.

Production quality[edit source]

Picture and sound quality are both good. The presentation came across very professionally. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)