Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Self-confidence

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hi, here's a reference you might find useful that looks at theoretical and evidence based notions of self confidence: http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55580/1/680150110.pdf Thegrounav (discusscontribs) 14:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Ive found a counselling site that talks about what Self-confidence is, how it is initially developed, influences on self-confidence and more. I think this would be a good starting point. Here is the link, hope it helps. http://www.counselingcenter.illinois.edu/self-help-brochures/self-awarenessself-care/self-confidence/ Verity Foster-Greenwood (discusscontribs) 01:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jacinta, As per our conversation looks like we are in the same boat as far as starting our assignment goes. Hopefully we can get a few contribution marks by helping each other out. U3067894 (discusscontribs) 11:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Matt's contributions[edit source]

Headings[edit source]

Hi Jacinta, I have edited your headings so that they fit in with Wikiversity's conventions. U3067894 (discusscontribs) 11:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Boxes[edit source]

Hey Jacinta, As per your request I added boxes to your sections :) 137.92.97.212 (discuss) 08:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Oops forgot to log in before I did it U3067894 (discusscontribs) 08:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


Hey great chapter! Just letting you know I'll be linking your chapter to my page (self-esteem). Best of luck! --Jetlyn Payne (discusscontribs) 16:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

This is an interesting chapter with great practical application - well done!

Theory[edit source]

Some theoretical constructs are embedded, however this is an area for improvement. A section dedicated to relevant theory would benefit the chapter.

Research[edit source]

Presentation of relevant and interesting research is a highlight of this chapter. The research is explored in sufficient detail for the target audience. Well done for covering practical application so thoroughly - this is fantastic! To improve further, try to include some evidence of critical thinking.

Written expression[edit source]

This chapter is nicely presented and follows a very clear structure. APA is generally well done, and the quiz is a great addition. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit source]

A very good presentation - nice job!

Structure and content[edit source]

Theory and research are really nicely integrated into this chapter. The flow is clear and logical. Key concepts have been well identified, which helps to make the presentation nicely balanced.

Communication[edit source]

Verbal communication is clear and engaging. The use of pictures makes the presentation more engaging, however I would suggest that dot points on some more slides would be beneficial. Well done for the practical focus and real life examples!

Production quality[edit source]

Sound and picture quality are both good, and basic tools have been used well. Rehearsing a few more times before recording may have improved the delivery further. ShaunaB (discusscontribs