Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Paradoxical intention

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi There, yes you have done a great job. Unfortunatley I dont have much input, especially technically, but I did learn a fair bit from your chapter. Duane Toohey180.200.173.254 (discuss)


Hi Victoriagc (discusscontribs) 03:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Hi Siobhan Good job, we mature aged students have managed to battle through the technology! Thank you for your post, had to delete sibling jealousy due to my mammoth reference list taking me over the word count! I managed to figure out how to insert a quote so here is the blah blah. I thought maybe you could use it for your 'bull by the horns' quote.

“your quote”.
(author)

This one will put it in a box


“your quote”.
(author)

The number is for coulor, go to this link for colour/number chart. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Pretty_boxes

You may be done, but if not maybe these will help.

Well done, we are nearly there!!!Rosey0703 (discusscontribs) :)

Social Contributions:

https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2013/Alcohol_and_university_student_motivation&action=history

https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2013/Jealousy&action=history

https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2013/Emotion_and_health&action=edit&redlink=1

https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2013/Animals_and_Emotion&action=history

http://learnonline.canberra.edu.au/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=248402 S K Hill (discusscontribs) 07:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference Indentation[edit]

Hey! I made your reference list indented. Hope it helps and you don't mind me editing! :) Good luck, so close to being done!!!! JodieVeitch (discusscontribs)


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

A good attempt, see comments below for future improvement.

Theory[edit]

The chapter lacked any theoretical coverage – for future improvement explore theories as to why paradoxical intention is effective etc

Research[edit]

The chapter explored some interesting and seminal research, well done. For future improvement, include some more current research, the 10 year rule is a good rule of thumb. The chapter also needs some inclusion of critical analysis

Written expression[edit]

The chapter had some written expression issues, a thorough edit before submission can help this.

The learning features included some figures and a quiz, well done. For future improvement include some in text links. The APA style was generally solid, good job. Remember to apply APA style to all figures, include page number in reference after direct quotes, and include DOI or web address for each ref. Great effort!Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

Overall a good effort, see comments below for feedback

Structure and content[edit]

The presentation had good coverage of the research included in the chapter. For future improvement, expand to cover theoretical background and self help application

Communication[edit]

The presentation made good use of powerpoint and was well paced, good job. The case study was a good, engaging feature. For future improvement include some more interactive features such as images to engage the viewer further

Production quality[edit]

The quality of the presentation was sound, well done. The audio quality was a little fuzzy. Remember to include licensing information. Great effort! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)