Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Optimism

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

Overall, a great attempt, you have produced a solid and balanced chapter – well done! Remember to stick to word count – unfortunately couldn’t include all the chapter for marking as it went substantially over the word limit

Theory[edit source]

The chapter covered several relevant models which was nice to see. For future improvement, engage in critical analysis of the models examined

Research[edit source]

The chapter included some interesting research, and clearly benefited from wide reading, well done. There was some evidence of critical engagement and future directions for research which was great – keep working on this skill for improvement.

Written expression[edit source]

The chapter was generally well written, good job.

The learning features included were fantastic, unfortunately I could not count the quiz as the chapter had reached word count by this point. The APA style was generally solid. Remember to include APA style for all figures, as well as DOI’s or web addresses for each ref. Great work! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.


Overall[edit source]

A very creative presentation, well done.

Structure and content[edit source]

The presentation had fantastic coverage of the key points of the chapter in a short timespace, well done.

Communication[edit source]

The presentation was well paced. The presentation was creative and engaging as well as making good use of images and videoing, well done. The voiceover was a little fuzzy at times, and some of the video segments I was unable to understand what they were saying.

Production quality[edit source]

The quality of the presentation was good, but see above comments for difficulties in understanding at times. The picture quality was also fuzzy at points. The presentation made good use of basic and advanced tools. Remember to include licensing information and references. Fantastic effort! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)