Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Nicotine and motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit]

Hi, I (Peg93 (discusscontribs) 09:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)) just finished an assignment on quitting smoking and it included nicotine addiction- I noticed that you had a section on quitting included in your topic. Here are some references that I used if they would help you out! The Australian institute of health and welfare (AIHW) is a really great site with some good statistics especially

AIHW 2012. Risk factors contributing to chronic disease. Cat. no. PHE 157. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 17 October 2013 http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737421466.
Aubin, H., Bobak, A., Britton, J. R., Oncken, C., Billing, C. B.,Jr, Gong, J., . . . Reeves, K. R. (2008). Varenicline versus transdermal nicotine patch for smoking cessation: Results from a randomised open-label trial. Thorax, 63(8), 717-724.
Delahunt, J., & Curran, J. P. (1976). Effectiveness of negative practice and self-control techniques in the reduction of smoking behavior. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 44(6), 1002-1007. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.44.6.1002
Doll, R. & Hill, B. (1954). "The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits: a preliminary report” Bristish Medical Journal. 328 (7455): 1529–1533; doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1529
Jorenby D. E., Hays J. T., Rigotti N. A. , Azoulay S., Watsky E. J. , Williams KE, Billing CB, Gong J, Reeves KR (2006). "Efficacy of varenicline, … vs placebo or sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal American Medical Association 296 (1): 56–63.doi:10.1001/jama.296.1.56
Keating, G. M., & Lyseng-Williamson, K. A. (2010). Pharmacoeconomic Spotlight on Varenicline as an Aid to Smoking Cessation. CNS Drugs, 24(9), 797-800.
M. Fiore, C. Jaén, T. Baker, W. Bailey, N. Benowitz, S. Curry et al. (2008) A Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. A U. S. Public Health Service Report Am J Prev Med, 35 (2), pp. 158–176
Marston, A. R., & McFall, R. M. (1971). Comparison of behavior modification approaches to smoking reduction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36(2), 153-162.
Stead, L. F., Perera, R., Bullen, C., Mant, D., & Lancaster, T. (2008). Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), CD000146.

Hey there! I have been researching smoking for another assignment and came across this article. Not sure if you'll find it useful at all but I found it interesting :) Lindson-Hawley, N., Aveyard, P., & Hughes, J. R. (2013). Gradual Reduction vs Abrupt Cessation as a Smoking Cessation Strategy in Smokers Who Want to QuitGradual Reduction vs Abrupt Cessation to Quit SmokingGradual Reduction vs Abrupt Cessation to Quit Smoking. JAMA, 310(1), 91-92. Ashkrance (discusscontribs) 02:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey i was doing the same thing so here's a couple of rescources:
Bernstein, D. (1969). Modification of smoking behavior: An evaluative review, Psychological Bulletin, 71(6), 418-440. doi: 10.1037/h0027367 Leventhal, H., & Cleary, P. (1980). The smoking problem: A review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification, Psychological Bulletin, 88(2), 370-405. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.370
Lichtenstein, E. (1982). The smoking problem: A behavioral perspective, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(6), 804-819. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.50.6.804
Lichtenstein, E., & Glasgow, R. (1992). Smoking cessation: What have we learned over the past decade?, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(4), 518-527. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.60.4.518
--Liam 8 (discusscontribs) 07:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kelsey you've got great stuff on your page, especially the introduction to the subject. And based on your headings it seems like it'll be a well thought out chapter with good information. The how to quit smoking part at the end definitely ties it in to the 'self help' book chapter concept. Akshoo93 (discusscontribs) 01:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

So far this looks great! The history and the explanation of intrinsic and extrinsic has good depth but easy to understand and enjoyable to read. Though whilst reading the section on biological properties I am slightly confused, unsure where or how the figures used outlined in the sentence typical smoker, 5 min and 300 hits are to work out, maybe there is some text missing here?? I see you have a super start on your chapter. Good luck and looking forward to reading the remainder.

Heading casing[edit]

Crystal Clear app ktip.svg
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

your chapter is looking awesome! great job, it looks like something off Wikipedia, very professional and well thought out!! Lady Jay (discusscontribs) 09:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

I agree with the above comment! Smiley.svg. Consider adding some wiki links for key concepts - to other relevant book chapters (or sections) or relevant Wikipedia articles - e.g., I've hyperlinked the first mention of nicotine, like this nicotine. Also look for ways in particular to link with with nicotine and emotion chapter. Overall, looks fantastic and great to see your #motem13 tweets too! Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for comments[edit]

Hi all, thank you for your comments, suggestions and links. They were a great help :) Kelseyv23 (discusscontribs) 04:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

A great effort on an informative and important chapter, well done.

Theory[edit]

The chapter discussed two theories, it was good to see a focused approach. For future improvement, engage in critical analysis of the theories to provide more substance to the chapter.

Research[edit]

The chapter clearly benefited from wide and relevant research, well done. Remember to back up all statements with evidence - particularly the first few paragraphs. Again, for future improvement engage in critical analysis of the research

Written expression[edit]

The chapter was generally well written, well done. There was some grammatical error throughout, thoroughly editing before submission can be useful.

The learning features were great, I particularly liked the quiz. The APA style was solid, remember to include APA style for figures and to italicise journal numbers in the reference list, good job! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

A succinct and well presented summary, good job.

Structure and content[edit]

The presentation had good coverage of all the theories and research, well done. For future improvement, slight expansion on the self help applications could be included to further draw viewers to the chapter.

Communication[edit]

The presentation made good use of images, some animation and had a basic but visually appealing powerpoint, well done. The presentation was well paced. For future improvement, perhaps include music, a case study or more images to make it even more engaging for the viewer

Production quality[edit]

The quality of the presentation was sound, and it made good use of basic tools, well done. Good effort! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)