Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Motivational music

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall What an interesting topic! Some interesting research is presented, however overall, further exploration is required. Theory A few theoretical constructs are incorporated into this chapter however more in-depth exploration is required. The same feedback applies for practical application of the constructs - further exploration would be beneficial. Research Research is the strength of this chapter. Some really interesting and useful research is put forward. To improve further, include evidence of critical thinking. Written expression The structure is sound however it appears incomplete e.g. there is no conclusion. The layout could be improved by including some colour and more images. Interaction features would also be beneficial. Remember that in APA referencing page numbers are not required unless you are presenting a direct quote. ShaunaB (discuss • contribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall The content of this presentation is nicely put together. However, the absense of a voice over does not comply with the marking critiera. Structure and content Theory and research are well integrated throughout this presentation. However, there is perhaps too much information included. I would suggest that if this was produced as a video with dialogue, the information would not have fit within 5 minutes. The flow is logical and clear. Information presented is of academic quality. Communication Information is clearly communicated via the slides. There is no dialogue included (see marking criteria). The music goes perfectly with the presentation (and yes, it did make me want to get out of my chair!). Production quality Picture and sound quality are both good. The presentation is delivered in a professional manner. As this is not a video as such, a more basic set of production tools have been used. ShaunaB (discuss • contribs)