Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Lying
Add topiclying
[edit source]Hey there. I find this topic so interesting, cause people lie all the time. Anyway I found this article that I thought would be a good, because it also talks about animal behaviour not only peoples Why do we lie I hope this is of some use to you, good luck! DorisWeasley (discuss • contribs) 01:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I think this is going to be a very interesting read. I found an article that has a focus on the operationalization of lies, involving social interactions in everyday life. Might be interesting to look into. I think the comment above by DorisWeasley, looking into animals behaviour would also be interesting to look into. Good luck!
Scott, R. I. (2004). Politics, advertising, and excuses: Why do we lie? ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 61(2), 187 – 195. Sara-anne123 (discuss • contribs) 05:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Chapter review and feedback
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements. |
Overall[edit source]A good attempt on a fascinating chapter, well done. The chapter had some interesting theoretical coverage. I particularly liked the self/other oriented lie model. To improve further, engage in critical analysis of the theories examined. The chapter explored wide and interesting research, good job. For future improvement, incorporate critical analysis of the literature. The chapter had some written expression, grammar and punctuation issues, a thorough edit before submission can help this. The learning features included figures and a quiz, well done. Unfortunately as the word limit was exceeded I could not count the quiz towards marks. For future improvement try including some in text links. The APA style was generally solid, good job. Remember to apply APA style to all figures and include DOI or web address for each ref. Great effort!Courtney.reis (discuss • contribs)
|
Multimedia feedback
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process. |
Overall[edit source]Overall a good effort, well done The presentation had some good coverage of the theory, and some good integration of research from the chapter. For future improvement, expand to cover the self help application to help draw in the viewer The presentation used a basic camera presentation. I can see the effort at creativity with the soft toy examples. However, to engage the viewer further for future improvement, I would suggest rerecording to a powerpoint to help the flow of the presentation and allow greater creativity The quality of the presentation was a little fuzzy and the audio was unclear making it difficult to understand at points. owever, the presentation made good use of basic tools. Remember to include reference and licensing information. Great effort! Courtney.reis (discuss • contribs) |