Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Joy

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Visual aids[edit source]

Hey there, your page is looking really great so far, but i think it could really benefit from some pictures to make the page more visual. Also don't forget you need to have you references indented:) I used the code { {refbegin|indent=yes} } (put the }} together though, i just spaced it because the code didn't show.) just before starting my references, and then

{ {refend}} at the end. 

If that doesn't work for you, there are other suggestions on moodle References on moodle discussion Hope that helps! Good luck DorisWeasley (discusscontribs) 05:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

Great job - this is a very well constructed book chapter.

Theory[edit source]

Well done for chosing a few important theories and discussing them in detail. This gave the chapter a strong foundation. Practical application of the theories was particularly good. To improve further, try to provide some evidence of critical evaluation.

Research[edit source]

The research presented was put forward in a concise and clear manner, with evidence of a sound understanding of the material. Integration with theoretical perspectives was also done quite well.

Written expression[edit source]

Written expression was very well done, with the layout of the chapter being a particular highlight. APA referencing was also generally well done, however please ensure that references are provided in all instances when ideas are not your own (this was relevant in the neurological fundamentals section). I would encourgae the inclusion of some more interactive learning features and links to other pages.ShaunaB (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

A clear presentation, which covers the topic well. Nicely done!

Structure and content[edit source]

A useful summary of chapter content is provided in this presentation. Theory and research are well integrated, and practical applications are included. The flow is clear and logical.

Communication[edit source]

The presentation is delivered in a clear and confident voice. It was quite engaging. Slides are generally appropriate, although there did appear to be very few slides to accompany the first half of the presentation.

Production quality[edit source]

Sound and picture quality are both good. The presentation appears well-prepared and professional. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)