Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Hofstede's dimensions of cultural value and motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Testing discussion page

Heading casing[edit source]

Crystal Clear app ktip.svg
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks James, all fixed U3067894 (discusscontribs) 06:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

These two internal wikiversity links may be useful for your chapter in terms of interactivity:

And "Dance in Bougival" by Renoir An image of Impressionism, European dance, possibly the Waltz, as an example of culture. U3054911 (discusscontribs) 06:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Matt, I found useful article on culture and motivation which I have added to your reference list(De Castella). Hope this helps!U3068081 (discusscontribs) 11:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

A great effort on an informative chapter, well done.

Theory[edit source]

The chapter discussed several theories, and covered one in detail; it was good to see a focused approach. For future improvement, engage in critical analysis of the theories to provide more substance to the chapter.

Research[edit source]

The research was applied in a logical manner, well done. However, the chapter could benefited from a wider array of research, as well as critique - there was a tendency towards description over analysis.

Written expression[edit source]

The chapter was generally well written, well done. The layout was engaging and easy to follow. Though it is a wikiversity book chapter, also bear in mind that is an academic resource, and at times the writing strayed from this a little more than was appropriate.

The learning features were great, I particularly liked the quizzes. For future improvement include some in text links and perhaps some more figures. The chapter clearly made an effort to inform and make sure the understood the concepts. The APA style was solid, remember to include DOI's or web addresses for all refs and to italcises journal names and numbers, good job! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.


Overall[edit source]

A succinct summary, good job.

Structure and content[edit source]

The presentation had good coverage of all the theories and research, well done. For future improvement, slight expansion on the self help applications could be included to further draw viewers to the chapter.

Communication[edit source]

The presentation used basic text and powerpoint slides. The presentation was well paced, though the computer voice was quite distracting. For future improvement, perhaps record with an audio voiceover, and include a case study and images to make it more engaging for the viewer

Production quality[edit source]

The quality of the presentation was sound, and it made good use of basic tools, well done. For future improvement see comments above re: audio. Good effort! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)