Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Health behaviours

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Woohoo!![edit source]

Hey Paige!! Thanks so much for all the links you have provided to me!! I had not come across them in my own research so they did help quite a lot!! Your page looks so good as well!! It flows really well and is quite easy to read! I think that the example boxes that you have used add a great deal to the chapter! Well done and good luck with getting your audio finished!! TomMarvoloRiddle (discusscontribs) 23:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's link[edit source]

Hi Paige, thanks for your helpful comments on my page, it is VERY much appreciated. Your chapter is fantastic, I think we should link pages as health is often a big area for goal setting and I think you have some really useful and relevant stuff. Well done on your page and thanks again! Jen.Robson (discusscontribs) 11:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re reference[edit source]

Hi Paige! Thanks for that article, if only I had access to that earlier!! :( I have just been running through and culling bits and pieces and I may have chopped out a bit too much in extrinsic motivation... We shall see. I also saw a teeny tiny spelling error in your "Mental and social health" section, changing the word "problesm" to "problems". but apart from that your page is looking swell!! TomMarvoloRiddle (discusscontribs) 11:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit source]

Hi there, i was looking over your chapter and thought i could point out there are a few psychological theories about health behaviour maintenence and promotion - The Health Belief Model, Protective Motivation Theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action / Theory of Planned Behaviour. These would be directly related to your chapter and I suggest looking into them, they all talk about what factors influence motivations concerning health behaviour. Goodluck Rashpocket (discusscontribs) 06:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I have come back to your chapter to see your progress, I wanted to suggest maybe including a diagram of the TRA/TPB so you can have more word space for strategies to improve health behaviours to continue the theme of the book :) Rashpocket (discusscontribs) 02:02, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heading casing[edit source]

Note that the Wikiversity convention is for lower-case headings. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

some refereces[edit source]

hey! i just did an assignment on this very topic so I've copied my reference list for you just to make things a little bit easier! also, while you have a good coverage of what motivates health behaviours, because this is a self help book, i think maybe you should try to focus more on the aspect of how health behaviours can improve your life and strategies and exercises on that helping/self improvement aspect.

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychology & Health, 15, 173-189.

Baban, A., & Craciun, C. (2007). Changing health-risk behaviors: A review of theory and evidence-based interventions in health psychology. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioural Psychotherapies, 7(1), 47-67.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Self-efficacy. In A. Bandura, (Ed.) Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory (pp. 390-453). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational application of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275–302.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Bandura, A., & Wood, R. E. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standard on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805-814.

Becker, M. H. (Ed.). (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Thorofare: Slack.

Becker, M. H., Maiman, L. A., Kirscht, J. P., Haefner, D. P., & Drachman, R. H. (1977). The health belief model and prediction of dietary compliance: A field experiment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 18(4), 348-366.

Conner, M., & Norman, P. (Eds.). (2005). Predicting health behaviour (2nd rev. ed.). England: Open University Press.

Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K. & Lewis, F. M. (Eds). (2002). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Harrison, J. A., Mullen, P. D., & Green, L. W. (1992). A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Education Research, 7, 107–116.

Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1–47.

Kazdin, A. E. (1979). Imagery elaboration and self-efficacy in the covert modeling twatment of unassertive behaviour. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 725-733.

Lee, C. (1989). Theoretical weaknesses lead to practical problems: The example of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Behavioural Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20(2), 115-123.

Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Social cognitive theory. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour (2nd rev. ed., pp. 127-169). England: Open University Press.

Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.

Nicki, R. M., Remington, R. E., & MacDonald, G. A. (1985). Self-efficacy, nicotine-fading/self-efficacy monitoring and cigarette smoking behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22, 477-485.

Rejeski, W. J., Miller, M. E., Foy, C., Messier, S., & Rapp, S. (2001). Self-efficacy and the progression of functional limitations and self-reported disability in older adults with knee pain. Journal of Gerontology: Series B

Social Sciences, 56(5), 261-265. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.5.S261

Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 94–127.

Rosenstock, I. M., & Kirscht, J. P. (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 470–473.

Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education & Behavior, 15(2), 175–183. doi:10.1177/109019818801500203

Schunk, D. H., & Cox, P. D. (1986). Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 201-209.

Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 217-243). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

--Kerrington (discusscontribs) 11:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being Bold![edit source]

Hey I hope you don't mind, but we were told to be bold and edit other people's pages, yours looked pretty great to me but I did indent your references for you! Makes them much easier to read and distinguish from one another. Hope it helped :) JodieVeitch (discusscontribs)


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

An informative and useful applied chapter, well done.

Theory[edit source]

The chapter had some fantastic theoretical coverage. Different models were explored which was good to see. There was fantastic engagement with critical analysis – keep working on this skill for future improvement.

Research[edit source]

The chapter contained research but was not emphasised throughout. It contained some informative statistics, well done. For future improvement, include more empirical studies and engage in critical analysis

Written expression[edit source]

The chapter was generally well written, great work. Some minor spelling and punctuation issues, edit before submission to remedy this.

The learning features were fantastic, good job. For future improvement try including some more in text links in the body. The APA style was generally solid, good job. Remember to apply APA style to all figures and to include DOI’s or web addresses for each ref. Great effort!Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

Overall a fantastic presentation, well done!

Structure and content[edit source]

The presentation had good coverage of some theoretical background self help applications, however it would benefit in the future from inclusion of more of the research from the chapter. The summary at the end was very effective, good work

Communication[edit source]

The presentation made good use of vimeo, good work. The presentation was well paced, engaging and visually appealing, with a good balance of images and text.

Production quality[edit source]

The quality of the presentation was sound, well done. The audio quality was great. Remember to include references. Great effort! Courtney.reis (discusscontribs)