Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Emotion and trust

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing[edit]

FYI, Wikiversity convention is for lower-case headings. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Ideas[edit]

Hi, I really like what you've done so far :) I think that this topic has the potential to tie in with the memory and emotion chapter too in regards to traumatic early memories that might cause a person to be untrusting or fearful-avoidant. Here's a link; https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2013/Memory_and_emotion

I like the graphic and the quote that you have used. I would suggest changing the quote font though and inserting it within text lower down the page in italics. I'm not sure how to do it specifically, maybe check the apa 6th guide. Awesome work! Best of luck! PatrickBateman (discusscontribs) 07:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your page is looking great :) Just something James told me: with the wiki headings, you don't need to capitalise more than the first word in the heading. eg. "Cats and dogs" instead of "Cats and Dogs". I hope that's helpful! Ashkrance (discusscontribs) 06:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Trust test[edit]

Hello, I really enjoyed the part that you included the trust test! I feel nervous that I got only 3 out of 7 which has trust issues? I am wondering if this trust test is valid or not..! Because many other people will see this chapter and take tests - they may just believe the test results without consideration. However, it was a good & very engaging attempt to put the test on your page! Good luck on the rest of your wiki :) JisuKim (discusscontribs)


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

Great job! This is a particularly well balanced chapter.

Theory[edit]

Theory is well identified, with a small number of important theories explored. The level of detail provided is appropriate for the target audience. Well done for including contrasting views.

Research[edit]

Research is well integrated throughout this chapter. Contrasting views are once again a particular strength. To improve further, try to include some of your own critical analysis.

Written expression[edit]

This chapter is really nicely presented, and follows a clear strcuture. The quiz was a particular highlight. To improve further, include more links throughout. The layout of the beginning of the chapter could also be improved. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

A well designed presentation. The variety throughout makes it particularly engaging.

Structure and content[edit]

Theory and research are integrated throughout. Key concepts have been well chosen. The flow is not always smooth - this is an area for improvement.

Communication[edit]

Ideas are communicated well, in a clear and confident voice. Remember that this is supposed to be a summary of your book chapter, not a narration of the content. The communication of ideas via images is not always clear. Having said this, you have clearly made an effort to present this in a creative way, so well done for that.

Production quality[edit]

Picture and sound quality are both good. Production tools have been used effectively. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)