Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2011/Work motivation and work satisfaction

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

References[edit source]

Check the casing in the reference list e.g., journal article titles should be lower case. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC) Done (hopefully)[reply]

Hey there, your page is looking great. I was wondering if its okay for me to add to my also see section? Trinand 11:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely - please feel free to add your chapter to the links section

Wow... your page looks great - so much information. Great job!U881426 12:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks![reply]

Hey, I love your page! Not sure what you originally had with the referencing formatting and what you changed, but I capitalised the journal titles (not the article titles) going by Burton I think that's right. I think the volume numbers are supposed to be in italics too, but I left them alone. Part of my topic is about students' ideas about the fairness of all this formatting stuff - it's a pain for a lot of people, me included! Yapp84 21:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A really interesting topic as I used to work in this area as a motivator - At one company, the staff did particularly well for the month - I gave the entire staff an all expenses paid weekend at the Gold Coast with their partners - limos, 5 star - the lot - everyone went "Yahoo" except one girl who threw the voucher on the floor and flounced off to her office - apparently she resented the fact that her work made a lot of money but she only got a lousy weekend in a 5 star hotel. In this case, no motivatation will do the trick and you have to get rid of them as their attitude creates bad blood. Another interesting topic at a later date would be 'When Motivation Does Not Work'. You have done well - congratulations - Magnolia


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall comments
    1. This chapter lays out applicable theories, provides a persuasive argument on why work motivation is important, and then integrates research with theory, leading into advice/ tips on how it can be enhanced. I particularly like the argument that work motivation is dynamic and contextual, which shows an understanding of the multidimensional and functional nature of motivation.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Theory comments
    1. The problem statement is clear and engaging.
    2. Good critical analysis of theories and their limitations in understanding all aspects of work-related behaviour.
    3. Demonstrates knowledge of multiple theories in motivation and emotion, however, sometimes reads like a list of applicable concepts.

Research[edit source]

  1. Research comments
    1. Great to see inclusion of a meta-analysis! Discussion of this could be strengthened by including effect size.
    2. An impressive breadth of research was discussed but might benefit from further use of subheadings around needs, traits, values, cognition and affect, to help readers follow the content.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression comments
    1. Well done uploading your own image and including multiple relevant multimedia links!
    2. The chapter demonstrates mastery of the ability to insert wiki images to facilitate understanding of concepts; however, these would be improved with explanatory captions.
    3. A few minor errors were evident in text. Try to avoid sentence fragments and proofread for typos (e.g., “Whereas a thriving organisation is the result of a thriving workforce.”; “Therefore that these factors are focused on to enhance work motivation”; “‘which is estimate to reduce”; “high regulated”; Is “retaining the mind” meant to be retraining?).
    4. The summary provides powerful take-home messages consistent with the self-help focus of the chapter.

Rfoster 03:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an impressive, solid, simple, but effective presentation. The voice-over is excellently scripted and paced. There wasn't too much or too little. And the focus maintained on the self-help theme was a stand-out feature.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Excellent general introduction, using Maslow's hierarchy of needs, leading into work.
  2. The presentation followed a clear structure
  3. The content was well-structured, with examples.

Communication[edit source]

  1. Well-paced (many presentations were too fast).
  2. Practical-focus was excellent, with practical take-home messages; fulfilled the self-help theme

Production quality[edit source]

  1. Simple, effective production
  2. Slides were well-prepared
  3. Images sources were not acknowledged.
  4. Would you consider releasing this under a Creative Commons license?

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks very much for the feedback! I'm happy to release this under Creative Commons but I'm unsure how to do this. Can you advise me how to do this?

--Flow 07:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for considering this! Either in the description or the comments field for the recording, you could simply add a statement that the recording is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]