This is a very interesting chapter - particularly the section on anticipatory grief - but nothing prepares the individual for the actual death - would like to see some researcher delve into this. - Well done - Magnolia
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Discussion of of Bowlby’s theory of attachment as applied to grief and Kubler Ross’ stage theory of grief identifies limitations, demonstrating critical analysis.
A variety of relevant theories are discussed in detail, including theories extending beyond the scope of material presented in the unit, while integrating them with important concepts that were covered, such as meaning, self-concept, and emotional regulation.
Studies mentioned in text are well-described to illustrate key assertions and use further research to extend and support findings. Inclusion of effect size would strengthen this discussion.
The list of references is expansive and relies on multiple recent findings.
The self-help focus of the chapter was evident in the managing and overcoming grief section; the intervention studies used to address this component were quite insightful.
The chapter started and ended well, with definitions of grief (differentiating between mourning, grief and bereavement) upfront, and a key points summary at the end.
This chapter effectively utilised the additional features available in the wiki platform; the quote set up the topic from the very beginning, boxes assisted in highlighting the stages of grief, images (with poignant accompanying captions) were evocative and illustrated the key points beautifully, and the quiz was a great learning feature.
There were minimal errors throughout; however, be careful with some word use (affect/effect, Inedibility->inevitability).
APA style was in general expertly handled; however, try to avoid contractions.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.
Overall, this is an effective, solid presentation, using well-prepared slides with well-articulated audio. Perhaps less detailed content and more emphasis on focus questions and take-home messages could help to improve the presentation.
