Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Self-discrepancy theory and emotion

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Self-discrepancy theory and emotion:
In what ways does self-discrepancy help to understand emotion?
Replace this link once the multimedia presentation has been published.

Overview[edit | edit source]

Figure 1. Edward Tory Higgins developed the theory of Self-discrepancy

"Self-discrepancy theory proposes that specific conflicting cognitive representations of the self result in “emotional vulnerabilities" (Higgins, 1987).


Self-discrepancy theory states that individuals compare their 'actual' self to their 'ideal' and 'ought' self. The discrepancies between 'actual', 'ideal' and 'ought' are associated with emotional discomfort.


Edward Tory Higgins developed the self-discrepancy theory in 1987. He sought to show that having an internal disagreement causes emotional and psychological turmoil.

Focus Questions:
  • What is the relationship between self-discrepancy theory and emotion
  • How does self-discrepancy theory help us to understand emotion

Domains of the self[edit | edit source]

The self-discrepancy theory suggests three basic domains of the self:

The 'actual' self[edit | edit source]

  • the actual self is your representation of the traits you believe yourself to actually possess
  • it is/ can also be the traits that you believe others think you possess

The 'ideal' self[edit | edit source]

  • the ideal self is the idealised version of yourself created from your life experiences.
  • usually motivates change, improvement and/or achievement
  • presence or absence of positive outcomes

The 'ought' self[edit | edit source]

  • the ought self is the person you believe you should be or should become
  • represents obligations and responsibilities
  • it is the presence or absence of negative emotions

The 'ideal' and 'ought' selves act as guides by which the 'actual' self wants to be aligned

Case Study:

  • point 1
  • point 2
  • point 3

Standpoints of the self[edit | edit source]

Figure 2. Placeholder whilst I find image

the two standpoints from which 'the self' is perceived.

own[edit | edit source]

individuals standpoint

other[edit | edit source]

standpoint of a significant other (friends, family, spouse)

Additional domain of self[edit | edit source]

  • In 1999 Charles Carver further developed the theory of self-discrepancy by adding the domain of the feared self
  • The 'Feared' self being what one does not desire to be.

Previous theories proving this concept[edit | edit source]

  • something about how the theory developed and what came before it

Self inconsistency theory[edit | edit source]

Cognitive dissonance theory[edit | edit source]

  • when two beliefs are inconsistent it causes the individual to experience negatively arousing cognitive conflict (dissonance)
  • making the individuals want to change one of the beliefs to reduce it

the imbalance theory (Balance theory?)[edit | edit source]

  • proposed by Fritz Heider
  • cognitive consistency motive as a drive toward psychological balance
  • urge to maintain values and beliefs overtime

Have you been paying attention?

1 The 'ideal' self is the person you believe you should become:

True
False

2 Who developed the theory?:

Edward Higgins
Charles Carver


Applications[edit | edit source]

Cultural Considerations?[edit | edit source]

  • look into cultural considerations
    • is this theory consistent across cultures or amplified? or is this just the standpoints of the self?
  • does this theory work for people who are neurodivergent?
    • ties with procrastination, look at self-discrepancy theory and ADHD

Conclusion[edit | edit source]

The theory of self-discrepancy becomes applicable when addressing some of the psychological problems, individuals face with undesired self image. Self discrepancy theory inadvertently provides a means to systematically lessen negative affect associated with self discrepancies by reducing the discrepancies between the self domains in conflict with one another

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Barnett, M. D., Moore, J. M., & Harp, A. R. (2017). Who we are and how we feel: Self-discrepancy theory and specific affective states. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.024

Gore, & Cross, S. E. (2014). Week 3 - Gore & Cross (2014) - Who am I becoming? a theoretical framework for understanding self-concept change. Self and Identity, 13(6), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.933712

Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

Kitayama, S., & Tompson, S. (2015). Chapter two - a biosocial model of affective decision making: implications for dissonance, motivation, and culture. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 71–137. sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.04.001.

Reeve, J. (2018). Understanding motivation and emotion (7th ed., pp. 1–530). John Wiley & Sons.

Phillips, & Silvia, P. J. (2005). Self-awareness and the emotional consequences of self-discrepancies. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271559

Turner, Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Week 3 - Turner et al 1994 - Self and collective cognition and social context - MARKED UP BY UNIT CONVENER. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002

Suggestions for this section:

  • Important aspects for APA style include:
    • Wrap the set of references in the hanging indent template. Use "Edit source": {{Hanging indent|1= the full list of references}}
    • Author surname, followed by a comma, then the author initials separated by full stops and spaces
    • Year of publication in parentheses
    • Title of work in lower case except first letter and proper names, ending in a full-stop
    • Journal title in italics, volume number in italics, issue number in parentheses, first and last page numbers separated by an en-dash(–), followed by a full-stop
    • Provide the full doi as a URL and working hyperlink
  • The most common mistakes include:
    • Incorrect capitalisation
    • Incorrect italicisation
    • Citing sources that weren't read or consulted

External links[edit | edit source]

Provide up to 6 external links to relevant resources such as presentations, news articles, and professional sites. Use sentence casing. For example:

Suggestions for this section:

  • Only select links to major external resources about the topic
  • Present in alphabetical order
  • Include the source in parentheses after the link