Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Multimedia/Feedback/2010
Appearance
General feedback about the
multimedia presentation exercise
multimedia presentation exercise
This page provides a summary of feedback about the Motivation and emotion student multimedia presentations.
Marks
[edit | edit source]The mean mark was 72/100 without late submission penalties and 69/100 after late penalties.
Example presentations
[edit | edit source]One good way to get further feedback about the multimedia presentation exercise is to watch some which attained a high grade. Also note that feedback about each presentation can be found on the respective talk pages.
Here's a list of some very good presentations:
- Motivation and dementia
- Overeating
- Ekman's basic emotions
- Motivation and aggression in the workplace
- Neurobiology of aggression
- Happiness
- Depression
- Motivation and mate-seeking behaviour
- Emotion and facial expression
- Paraphilias
- Dieting
- Motivational toxicity
Marking criteria
[edit | edit source]Below are some general comments about this exercise.
Overall
[edit | edit source]- Overall, the standard varied widely, however none of the presentations submitted on time failed. Presentations ranged from simple bullet-point text and a monotone reading of a script through to highly creative and engaging interview-style presentations.
Structure and content
[edit | edit source]- The best presentations focused on presentating a smaller amount of carefully selected content.
- Many presentations tried to present too much in too little time.
- In the general introduction, at the beginning establish what is the topic? Why is it important? What will I learn by watching this?
- Image attributions wer often not included. Most presentations violated copyright by using non-free images and used them without acknowledgement.
- Several presentations did not indicate a copyright license.
Communication
[edit | edit source]- Engage the listener by establishing why the topic is important.
- In some presentations the sound was too quiet.
- In many presentations, the narration was too fast.
- In many presentations, the narrating voice could have used greater tonal variation to help arouse and maintain interest.
- Presentations that "took a risk" were often some of the better ones (e.g., by taking a creative approach - e.g., the presenter of the happiness chapter dressed up as a clown).
- Slide animation can be used effectively particularly to reveal bullet points one by one.
- Font colour could be different for key words
- Best to use font types such as Arial to aid clarity and readability.
Production quality
[edit | edit source]- Production quality was generally good.
- Avoid clashing background music with voice and vision - it's hard to concentrate on the key point. Some presentations used a short musical intro and conclusion which worked very well.
- Animation of bullet-points can help to focus viewer attention on each point
- Presentations were in the following formats (from most to least): screenr, youtube, archive.org. Youtube was an excellent platform for viewing and disseminating.
More info
[edit | edit source]- Some of the commonly repeated feedback is available here: {{Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Multimedia/Feedback/2010}}