Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Banded broadbill
This article is an unpublished pre-print undergoing public peer review organised by the WikiJournal of Science.
It is adapted from the Wikipedia page Banded broadbill. It contains some or all of that page's content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License and will also be used to update that article after peer review.You can follow its progress through the peer review process at this tracking page.First submitted:
Article text
QID: Q113866335
Suggested (provisional) preprint citation format:
Anonymous until published. "Banded broadbill". WikiJournal Preprints. Wikidata Q113866335.
License: 
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.
Andrew Leung 
(handling editor) contact
Alexandre Pedro Selvatti Ferreira Nunes
Article information
This is the pre-publication public peer review for the article Banded broadbill
Plagiarism check[edit source]
Pass. Report from WMF copyvios tool: detected identical paragraphs with animalia.bio, however this is not plagirism by the author, since it animalia.bio used text from the Wikipedia article (as stated in animalia.bio's references section). T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 23:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
First peer review[edit source]
Review by Alexandre Pedro Selvatti Ferreira Nunes 
, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
These assessment comments were submitted on , and refer to this previous version of the article
Introduction:
- 1st paragraph, 4th line: males and females should be described as virtually or almost in indistinct as males do have lighter foreheads than females (ref. 10)
Description: - undeveloped rictal bristles and feet characteristics worth mentioning as they are in the original description
I've addressed both of these points. AryKun (discuss • contribs) 15:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)