Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Conservation of resources theory and stress

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Heading casing

Hi U3054914. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

~~~~


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  3. Consider dropping the "Principal 1:" etc. text from the headings (i.e., just keep the substantive part)
  4. Check and correct inconsistent capitalisation and missing question mark
  5. I've simplified the heading structure a little
  6. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
  1. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest.
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  4. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with some relevant citations
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  3. Write the chapter using 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Under developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. A relevant figure is presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Caption should include Figure X. ...
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style
  5. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution
  1. Two uses of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. OK
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. include hyperlinked dois
    4. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. OK
    2. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
    3. Include only the best external links about this topic
  1. Good
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  5. Rename the book chapter link to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 02)
  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply