Talk:Hilbert Book Model Project

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page should only be used for discussion about the Hilbert Book Model Project (main page).

← Hilbert Book Model Project


Initial remarks[edit source]

The Hilbert Book Model cannot and does not claim to be a proper model of physical reality. This first version leaves several subjects undiscussed. Examples are generations of elementary modules, the binding of quarks, and how emission and absorption of photons occur in atomic modules. The Hilbert Book Model does not explain the difference in mass between elementary particles that physical experiments have discovered. According to the HBM, the current idea of conventional physics about physics must be false in several aspects. However, in most aspects mainstream physics is right and can be applied without hesitation. The HBM tries to explain binding of elementary modules into higher level modules with the characteristics of the stochastic mechanisms and not via force carrying objects or force fields. However, the HBM considers force raising fields. These fields explain inertia. According to the HBM the whole model proceeds with universe wide steps. The elementary modules regenerate with a fixed cycle period. The elementary modules zigzag over the progression value.

initiator[edit source]

The Hilbert Book Model is based on the paper Report of the Hilbert Book Model Project Another resource is docs.com/hans-van-leunen. Microsoft decided to stop supporting docs.com. Under the name Johannes van Leunen the author maintains a blog in Science20.com/physics. Everybody can criticize the Hilbert Book Model here or give advice on how to improve the project. According to the rules of Wikiversity, everybody can also edit the project pages. I reserve a bottle of fine French cognac for the one that detects and reports a significant flaw in the Hilbert Book Model. I hope that students and young scientists find inspiration in the ideas of the Hilbert Book Model. The Hilbert Book Model represents a controversial and unorthodox approach of treating the science about physical reality. It raises many philosophical problems. Further, it stimulates the creation of new mathematics. I hope many will join me and expand the Hilbert Book Model project such that we better understand physical reality.

The fact that the Hilbert Book Model impersonates the creator does not imply that this creator impersonates GOD. The HBM creator does not care for his creatures. After his creation, the HBM creator leaves his creatures alone.

Greathings, Hans --HansVanLeunen (discusscontribs) 09:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC) --HansVanLeunen (discusscontribs) 17:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC) HansVanLeunen (discusscontribs) 18:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translations[edit source]

The initiator will provide the project in English, Dutch, and German versions. The top level acts as introduction and as navigator to subpages. Independent of the language the links to the subpages will get the same titles but will show the language at the end(nl for Dutch, de for German). Thus the "Hilbert Book Model" page in English is Hilbert Book Model Project/Hilbert Book Model. The same page in Dutch is Hilbert Book Model Project/Hilbert Book Model/nl Dutch is the native language of the initiator. Later other translations may follow. Translations must closely follow the English version. If the English version changes or extends, then the translations must follow.HansVanLeunen (discusscontribs) 07:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)HansVanLeunen (discusscontribs) 11:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments[edit source]