Jump to content

Determinant/Alternating/Section

From Wikiversity

We want to show that the recursively defined determinant is a multilinear and alternating mapping. To make sense of this, we identify

that is, we identify a matrix with the -tuple of its rows. Thus, in the following, we consider a matrix as a column tuple

where the entries are row vectors of length .


Let be a field, and . Then the determinant

is multilinear. This means that for every , and for every choice of vectors , and for any , the identity

holds, and for , the identity

holds.

Let

where we denote the entries and the matrices arising from deleting a row in an analogous way. In particular, and . We prove the statement by induction over ,  For , we have and

due to the induction hypothesis. For , we have and . Altogether, we get

The compatibility with the scalar multiplication is proved in a similar way, see exercise.



Let be a field and . Then the determinant

is

alternating.

We proof the statement by induction over ,  So suppose that and set . Let and with be the relevant row. By definition, we have . Due to the induction hypothesis, we have for , because two rows coincide in these cases. Therefore,

where . The matrices and consist in the same rows, however, the row is in the -th row and in the -th row. All other rows occur in both matrices in the same order. By swapping altogether times adjacent rows, we can transform into . Due to the induction hypothesis and fact, their determinants are related by the factor , thus . Using this, we obtain


The property of the determinant to be alternating simplifies its computation. In particular, it is clear how the determinat behaves under elementary row operations. If a row is multiplied with a number , the determinant has to be multiplied with as well. If two rows are swapped, then the sign of the determinant changes. If a row (or a multiple of a row) is added to another row, then the determinant does not change.