Jump to content

Complex Analysis Cauchy Integral Theorem

From Wikiversity

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

The Cauchy integral theorem is one of the central results of complex analysis. It exists in various versions, and in this article, we aim to present a basic one for convex regions and a relatively general one for null-homologous cycles.

For Convex Regions

[edit | edit source]

Statement

[edit | edit source]

Let be a convex region, and let be a closed rectifiable curve in . Then, for every holomorphic function , the following holds:

Proof 1: Primitive of

[edit | edit source]

First, we observe that has a primitive in . Fix a point . For any point , let denote the straight-line segment connecting and .

Proof 2: Definition of the Primitive

[edit | edit source]

Define by:

.

Due to the convexity of , the triangle with vertices lies entirely within for .

Proof 3: Application of Goursat’s Lemma

[edit | edit source]

By Goursat’s Lemma for the boundary of a triangle with vertices , we have:

Proof 4: Conclusion Using Goursat's Lemma

[edit | edit source]

This leads to:

Thus, we have:

Proof 5: Limit Process

[edit | edit source]

Since is continuous in , taking the limit as gives:

Proof 5: Differentiability of

[edit | edit source]

Therefore, is continuous, and is differentiable in , with:

Since was arbitrary, we conclude , proving that has a primitive.

Proof 6: Path Integration

[edit | edit source]

Now, let be a piecewise continuously differentiable, closed curve. Then:

Proof 7:

[edit | edit source]

Let be an arbitrary integration path in , and let . As shown here, we choose a polygonal path such that , , and

Since polygonal paths are piecewise continuously differentiable, the above result implies . Consequently,

As was arbitrary, the claim follows.

For Cycles in Arbitrary Open Sets

[edit | edit source]

In arbitrary open sets, one must ensure that cycles do not enclose singularities or poles in the complement of the domain. Enclosing such singularities may contribute a non-zero value to the integral (e.g., the function and in a domain . Even though is holomorphic in , the integral is not zero but (see nullhomologous cycle).

Statement

[edit | edit source]

Let be open, and let be a nullhomologous cycle in . Then, for every holomorphic function , the following holds:

Proof

[edit | edit source]

Let , and define by

Then, is holomorphic, and by the global integral formula, we have:

See Also

[edit | edit source]

Page Information

[edit | edit source]

You can display this page as (Wiki2Reveal slides)

Wiki2Reveal

[edit | edit source]

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

Translation and Version Control

[edit | edit source]

This page was translated based on the following von Cauchy Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity: