WikiJournal of Science/A card game for Bell's theorem and its loopholes: Revision history

Read a revision by clicking on the date. Compare revisions by using the radio boxes.
External tools: Search · Statistics · Revisions · Page Views

(cur) = difference with current version, (prev) = difference with preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 04:5204:52, 15 June 2022‎ Bobamnertiopsis discuss contribs‎ m 47,523 bytes +22‎ tidy ref name undo

curprev 22:5422:54, 12 April 2020‎ ShakespeareFan00 discuss contribs‎ m 47,501 bytes +2‎ lint undo

curprev 02:0002:00, 11 June 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ m 47,499 bytes 0‎ ce undo Tag: 2017 source edit

curprev 13:2813:28, 8 June 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ m 47,385 bytes −9‎ ce undo Tag: 2017 source edit
curprev 13:2713:27, 8 June 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ 47,394 bytes +101‎ subpages moved to WikiJournal of Science/... undo Tag: 2017 source edit

curprev 17:1817:18, 3 June 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 47,293 bytes +36‎ Where will the subpages go? They are currently under the redirected namespace, outside of "WikiJournal of Science/" undo
curprev 17:0517:05, 3 June 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 47,257 bytes 0‎ I made the figure on commons more narrow. This new width simply reflects that fact (my laptop clipped the figure a bit) undo
curprev 02:2702:27, 3 June 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ 47,257 bytes +21‎ + doi undo Tag: 2017 source edit

curprev 19:5819:58, 2 June 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 47,236 bytes −13‎ cleaning awkward prose. If it was observed it was observed experimentally, so we don't need to say "experimentally" undo
curprev 14:3214:32, 2 June 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 47,249 bytes −9‎ The senteces I wrote a few days ago seem wordy: They for example don't need to know that Fig 1 follows since they have just started the article. undo
curprev 14:2714:27, 2 June 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 47,258 bytes 0‎ copy edit abstract (minor obvious changes-none controversial) undo
curprev 14:2514:25, 2 June 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 47,258 bytes +10‎ copy edit undo

curprev 23:5623:56, 28 May 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ m 47,067 bytes +1‎ ce undo Tag: 2017 source edit
curprev 23:5023:50, 28 May 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ 47,066 bytes −37‎ →‎Supplementary material: more versatile link undo Tag: 2017 source edit
curprev 20:5220:52, 28 May 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 47,103 bytes −1‎ →‎The conundrum: slightly simpler sentence structure undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 15:0115:01, 13 May 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 53,048 bytes +3‎ →‎The solitaire card game: ce undo
curprev 14:5914:59, 13 May 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 53,045 bytes −1‎ →‎The solitaire card game: ce undo
curprev 14:5614:56, 13 May 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ m 53,046 bytes −1‎ →‎The solitaire card game: ce undo
curprev 01:2201:22, 13 May 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 53,047 bytes +480‎ →‎The Rimstock cheat: Detector error loophole: Discussed the outcome for Figure 6 using Excel (good classroom activity: see supplement) undo

curprev 20:2520:25, 25 February 2018‎ MaintenanceBot discuss contribs‎ m 46,340 bytes −4‎ HTML5 cleanup undo

curprev 14:5214:52, 24 February 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 46,344 bytes +28‎ →‎Cheating at cards and Bell's theorem "loopholes": referencing user:Rimstock as the one who called this to our attention. undo
curprev 14:5114:51, 24 February 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 46,316 bytes −180‎ Moving footnote out of title and placing it above at the first reference to the Rimstock cheat. undo
curprev 13:3213:32, 24 February 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 46,496 bytes +15‎ The Rimstock is not likely not the first to ponder this, but instead the first to point this out to us. Also, is it OK to put a footnote in a title? undo
curprev 04:5504:55, 24 February 2018‎ Bobamnertiopsis discuss contribs‎ 46,481 bytes +1,442‎ wikified refs undo

curprev 17:4317:43, 22 February 2018‎ Guy vandegrift discuss contribs‎ 45,039 bytes +3‎ →‎A simple Bell's theorem experiment: Clarifying that the selection of three polarization angles is a design choice associated with the experimental setup under discussion, not a requirement for all such experiments. undo
curprev 11:4311:43, 22 February 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ 45,036 bytes +115‎ rev_permalink undo Tag: 2017 source edit
curprev 11:4211:42, 22 February 2018‎ Evolution and evolvability discuss contribs‎ 44,921 bytes +56‎ submitted undo Tag: 2017 source edit

WikiJournal of Science/A card game for Bell's theorem and its loopholes: Revision history

15 June 2022

12 April 2020

11 June 2018

10 June 2018

9 June 2018

8 June 2018

3 June 2018

2 June 2018

1 June 2018

28 May 2018

26 May 2018

18 May 2018

17 May 2018

16 May 2018

15 May 2018

14 May 2018

13 May 2018

12 May 2018

11 May 2018

10 May 2018

6 May 2018

2 May 2018

30 April 2018

29 April 2018

25 February 2018

24 February 2018

22 February 2018

18 February 2018

17 February 2018

Navigation menu

Search