Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Core emotions

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions[edit source]

@U3229619: Thanks for tackling this topic.

Some initial suggestions:

  • This is a broad topic, so it should introduce and link to more specific chapters about each of the core emotions, for example.
  • Note that there was a previous attempt, so check out that chapter and the feedback on its talk page.
  • Also check out other emotion chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work.

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing[edit source]

Hi U3229619. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

Headings[edit source]

  1. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development
  2. In particular, the chapter focuses on happiness (joy might be a better term - happiness is a broader concept), sadness, and fear, but does not cover disgust, anger, or interest. So provide less detail about those few core emotions and more coverage of the other core emotions. Aim for a balanced coverage.
  3. Rather than present Ekman's model, Plutchik's model etc. separately, consider presenting a synthesis that draws on these theories/research
  4. Quiz yourself does not need a heading; just embed quiz questions in their most relevant section

Overview[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. Add a scenario in a feature box at the start to help catch reader interest
  3. Engaging introduction
  4. There is no mention of psychology or key theory
  5. Focus questions
    1. Good
    2. Use open-ended questions

Key points[edit source]

  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Key suggestion is to provide equal coverage of each core emotion
  3. Excellent to see critical thinking (e.g., limitations)
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Under developed

Figure[edit source]

  1. A relevant figure is presented
  2. Captions could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text

Learning feature[edit source]

  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, table(s) etc.

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. italicisation

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Include source in brackets after link

User page[edit source]

  1. Good
  2. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Reasonably good
  2. Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest
  4. Reasonably good focus question(s)
  5. I've split the double-barrelled question

Theory[edit source]

  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/*)
  3. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  4. Generally well cited, but this is inconsistent and there is a lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations in some places (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)

Research[edit source]

  1. Excellent review of relevant research
  2. Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident

Integration[edit source]

  1. Excellent integration between theory and research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Excellent summary and conclusion
  2. Key points are well summarised
  3. Summarise key points
  4. Add practical, take-home message(s)

Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
    2. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
      3. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
    3. Tables
      1. Use APA style for captions. See example
      2. Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1)
    4. Citations use correct APA style
    5. References use generally correct APA style, with some minor inconsistencies

Learning features[edit source]

  1. Excellent use of learning features
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Basic use of image(s)
  5. Very good use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Good use of external links in the "External links" section
    1. Use sentence casing

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~8 logged, useful, mostly minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. This presentation has a good introduction to engage audience interest
  4. A context for the presentation is established
  5. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes little use of relevant psychological research
  6. Ideally, make more explicit use of research
  7. Excellent consideration of limitations
  8. The presentation includes some citations to support claims
  9. The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  10. The presentation provides easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well paced
  4. Good intonation
  5. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  6. Audio recording quality was very good
  7. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is very good
  2. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides
  3. Check and correct grammar (e.g., question mark missing from the title of the 2nd slide; brains -> brain's)
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  7. The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  4. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply