Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Facial expressions and the emotions of others

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hi,

I just looked over your page! How cool is this quiz option! I didn't even think to do that! I am definitely going to do something like this now! I think this is a really interesting topic! I am doing Sadness, can you please help me with some feedback once I have added some more information?

I think this topic has relevance to mine, in terms of dealing with Sadness. I think it's really interesting to know the influence of the emotions of others in terms of improving ones own emotional state. If it's OK I might use your page as a link to some of my information??

Riaana

Hey Smith6,

You have made great progress to your chapter. The pictures are useful is placing a imagine in my mind and the explantion of the facial muscle movements is interesting because it is something I have never been consciously aware about if you get what I mean lol.

I also found the part about the new iphone app for autistic children particularly interesting. Its a really good way that you related your topic to the modern world. Do you think though there would be any downfalls to using this app for autistic children?

Jess --Jess7 (discusscontribs) 21:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

A well constructed chapter - nice work!

Theory[edit source]

Theories were well defined and a sound understanding was demonstrated. Try to focus on fewer theories to enable deeper exploration and analysis of those which are presented. To improve further, work towards offering some critical analysis of the theories presented.

Research[edit source]

The resaerch presented was relevant and very interesting. Try to include more recent research where possible - the general rule in psychology is to look at literature over the past seven years (aside from key papers).

Written expression[edit source]

Written expression was quite well done, with the structure being particularly good. The use of a quiz made the chapter interactive from the beginning. APA style was generally adhered to. To improve further, include more links to other pages. Also, the use of a number of small tables can break-up the flow of the work - perhaps one larger table would be more effective. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

A nice presentation, which could be improved by integrating more research and using a wider range of slides.

Structure and content[edit source]

Theory is well explored, however key research could be better integrated . The flow is logical and clear.

Communication[edit source]

The presentation was delivered in a clear voice. Some information on slides was too small to read. I would also suggest the use of more slides. Perhaps one per construct would work well? More illustrative examples could also have been included.

Production quality[edit source]

Picture and sound quality were both good. The presentation did appear a little rushed towards the end, so perhaps some more careful planning would be beneficial. ShaunaB (discusscontribs)