Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070521200237
Which parts do you find complicated? We can probably hide them.
[edit source]- Comment: This is experimental. We can hide the scary wikitext with { { { SUBST: } } }
- )
--Hillgentleman|Talk 20:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[1]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070521200704
Your previous comment is here /20070519174254.
[edit source]- Comment: It lies in a deep thread.
That is one drawback of auto-collapsing. Anybody good with .js may try to see if it is possible to make an "expand all" button. For the moment, let us stay on topic. --Hillgentleman|Talk 20:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[2]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070521201312
To play this game, simply reply to the exact comment with the reply button under it.
[edit source]- Comment: Then the threads will sort themselves out.
Threaded discussions tell us: Clearly, human communication is complex. --Hillgentleman|Talk 20:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[3]
- Comment: Is this a precurser to liquidThreads ??? -- CQ 21:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[4]
Re: Is this a precurser to liquid threads? No.
[edit source]- Comment: I don't know what "liquid" means. This is a simple (see the text at /preload) and flexible model of threaded discussion. It is flexible because it is basically a set of pages, indexed by REVISIONTIMESTAMP, transcluded in a tree-like manner. The techniques used here are:
- transclusion/substitution meta:substitution#optional substitution
- preload
- NavFrame
- The m:magic word REVISIONTIMESTAMP
--Hillgentleman|Talk 21:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[5]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070521213744