WikipediaOS/Licensing
Hypothesis
[edit | edit source]Copyleft licensing determines all actions, processes and outputs as pieces that can be copied and recombined. Also reinforces the prominence of contributors and his work.
Votes/comments
[edit | edit source]
Support It was all more clear before the Creative Commons license adoption, since the same software-based license was useful for the purposes of the free encyclopaedia. --Esenabre 13:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Comment Not sure with teh following, can someone verify please? I think Wikipedia copied much of its content back then from an encyclopedia (Britannica?)? Probably it is mentioned somewhere. I assume this was PD? Though I wonder if being so, why this was not credited much more by Wikipedia? ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat 18:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Voting/commenting
[edit | edit source]You can comment or help to evaluate this research question by using these tags:
- {{agree}} makes I agree
- {{disagree}} makes
I disagree because - {{comment}} makes Comment
If you are not signed in, please include your name to help other participants know what name to refer to you by.
References
[edit | edit source]- References here