Talk:Recovery psychology

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Discussion[edit source]

Hello, just wanted to acknowledge this interesting and well-conceived project. I expect to learn quite a bit just by continuing to read your work. Thank you for putting this together Wikidgood (discusscontribs) 21:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not going to touch your work but I would find it easier to read if the first paragraph was broken up it is a bit long. Also, the first part of the paragraph comes across more clearly, I am lost down in the lower part must reread to follow the argument. A final point is that the critique of psychology without a recovery component seems to be more developed it is not that clear what the critique of the recovery movement is. I would suspect that the recovery movement is not sufficiently informed by the science of clinical psychology, which is a solid maybe even a profound insight. Wikidgood (discusscontribs) 21:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

@Wikidgood: The content was created 11 years ago and the primary author hasn't been active for a decade. Be bold. If you have a vision to improve the resource, make it better. -- Dave Braunschweig (discusscontribs) 15:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)