From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How can we further define the purpose/scope of this learning project?Elatanatari 20:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think it might be useful to outline exactly why someone would add a photo here. I've added a "gallery" section which has a little more detail on this - feel free to refine/replace, etc. I'll try to find a photo of mine somewhere that might generate a discussion. Cormaggio talk 21:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Constructive criticism on technique and composition?Elatanatari 00:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, that would be useful - and I think it would also be good to encourage people to ask how/why a photograph didn't turn out the way they wanted - an all-too-common occurrence! How else might we invite participation in this project? Cormaggio talk 16:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have that problem too. I'm not sure. We could have a brainstorming meeting on the IRC. 01:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you have a photograph that disappointed you, please upload it here (or on Commons), and we can discuss it. Or, if you have an issue to raise - please add it in the "issues" section below.. Cormaggio talk 22:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peter Blaise says: May I suggest that we ask each photographer what they want in terms of feedback? If someone just wants to know where to market their photo, and instead we tell them how to change their composition to suite our own preferences, then we're not being much help, are we? And remember, all we see are little tiny JPGs, and each of us has different display screen size, resolution, gamma, contrast, brightness, colors, gamut, ambient lighting (and more?) upon which to base our judgments! peterblaise 18:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]