Talk:Panspermia/a critique of Stardust Findings -Implications for Panspermia

There is definately life in the material because how does a microorganism survives through an extreme mix of early solar nebula and lands on earth without being alive.Bomor394 (talk) 05:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

A Critique of the logical Premise

It is a tautology to say that if life survived entry into Earth's atmosphere then it would be here. The above critique doesn't make an argument but restates the obvious. However, it is not what the actual article is saying. Based on the abstract, the article appears to state that since Stardust found the basic elements for life, then life has to exist outside of earth, which the author claims as a support to the Panspermia hypothesis. However, just because we have the materials to make an automobile, it does not follow that we have an automobile, nor prove the existence of an automotive factory. Alaxative 02:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

going to outta space is the only asurable way to prove this hypothese and it worked correctly.Bomor394 (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)