Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2025/Dialectical behaviour therapy and emotion regulation

General comments

Hi, this is a great Wiki and I persoanlly find the topic to be very interesting. A few things I found that could be removed or added were: - repeated who made DBT, just need to say once. More wikipedia links to core psychological terms such as emotional regulation. Great use in case studies and overall layout but try to refer to your figures within the text. I found it interesting how DBT was originally made for BPD and was later used for other psychological disorders. Out of curiosity, does the DBT process change at all depending on the type of disorder or is the process still the same. --U3258325 (discuss • contribs) 07:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Very good User page Created, with description about self and link to book chapter Social contribution Two summarised with indirect links to evidence Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Section headings Clear, simple 2-level heading structure See earlier comment about Heading casing. Key points Overview - Consider adding focus questions. Reasonably well developed, but more detail in some sections would be useful Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles. Consider introducing a case study in the Overview. Consider including more examples/case studies. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section. Image An image (figure) is presented. Caption uses APA style. Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text. Consider increasing image size from default. References Good. For full APA style: Use correct capitalisation Use the new recommended format for dois - http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2014/07/how-to-use-the-new-doi-format-in-apa-style.html Resources See also Use bullet-points Also link to past relevant chapters External links Use bullet-points Rename links so that they are more user friendly

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Helpful resource

Hi there, I have found the following book to be a helpful resource for getting my head around the basics of DBT. It does an excellent job of breaking down each skill component and making them very relatable for every day situations - you might find this helpful when putting together your case studies. Also, the library has a copy of the e-book available online. Hope this helps :)

Rathus, J., Miller, A., & Linehan, M. (2015). DBT skills manual for adolescents . New York: The Guilford Press.

--U3173480 (discuss • contribs) 04:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi! this is a great start. You may find this resource useful: https://bpded.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40479-019-0102-7 .. --U3173638 (discuss • contribs) 10:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Very interesting topic you have. I found this article which I think would be a very interesting to incorporate into your book chapter https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1077722919300756 Tahnee Smithers (discuss • contribs) 11:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Helpful Resources Suggestions

Hi, I think you have an important and interesting topic. I have found some peer reviewed journal article resources that may be interesting to read and/or add to your book chapter.

1. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2019.9 - DBT for emotion regulation difficulties. 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12359 - managing emotions using DBT during psychosis. 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2019.9 - managing emotion dysregulation using DBT for individuals experiencing eating disorders.

Kiara Stone (UC) (discuss • contribs) 19:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted The question mark was missing (fixed) 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but aim for closer alignment Consider expanding the structure to include more sub-headings 3. Overview Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A description of the problem/topic is provided Consider ways of providing a more integrated introduction (currently part 1 is DBT and part 2 is ER) Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Partial development of key points Overly focused on DBT Insufficiently focused on ER The key to this chapter is the relatioship between DBT and ER Insufficient use of citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan For sections with sub-sections, provide key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) Content from the previous chapter has been deleted; see page history if you want to use any of it 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Use APA style for figure captions Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution 6. Learning feature Promising in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Promising use of one or more table(s) Concentrate on DBT and ER Add APA style table caption Cite each table at least once in the text 7. References Basic What are the most relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses about this topic? Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to the "External links" section Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation use dois where available instead of other links use active hyperlinks for webpages A more thorough literature search is recommended. The goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic 8. Resources See also To be developed (see Tutorial 2) External links To be developed (see Tutorial 2) 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:02, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall This is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem genAI use appears to be appropriately acknowledged Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engaging scenario or case study Animated gif distracting (removed) Figure 1 is relevant to the scenario Scenario uses an appropriate feature box Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are good The focus questions could be improved by: FQ1 could also explain ED FQ3 could be more objective (e.g., what about evidence against?) Theory Excellent—key theories are very well explained and applied Builds in a basic way on Wikipedia articles but not related chapters by embedding interwiki links for key terms Insightful depth is provided about key theory(ies) Excellent use of tables, figures, and/or lists to clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research Greater emphasis on systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses would be ideal More detail about key studies would be ideal Claims are well referenced Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Very good integration between the most relevant theory(ies) and the best research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Insufficient integration with related chapters Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest Key points are well summarised The take-away messages for each focus question could be spelt out more clearly Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression The quality of written expression is excellent Use active (e.g., "this chapter explores" or "this chapter explored") rather than passive voice (e.g., "this chapter will explore" or "this chapter has explored") [1][2] Layout The chapter is reasonably well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional numbers, italics, bold, and/or change in font size) Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see tags); consider using a grammar checking tool, Studiosity, and/or peer feedback Possessive apostrophes are not used correctly (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats') Use past tense when describing research studies, although implications of findings could be in the present tense Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard APA style Use sentence casing for disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Figures Very well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Tables Well captioned Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations use excellent APA Style (7th ed.) References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Learning features Excellent use of learning features Add more embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. Add embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of figure(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of the See also section Add more links Very good use of the External links section Add more links Social contribution ~15 logged, useful, mostly moderate to major contributions with direct links to evidence Thanks for the Wiki Commons uploads

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)