Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Hygiene motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Helpful peer reviewed APA 7 article for Hygiene Motivation if you wish to add or remove!!

[edit source]

The concept of hygiene motivation is examined in the study by Curtis, V., & Cairncross, S. (2003), which emphasises that people's hygiene behaviours are primarily driven by the desire to avoid disgust rather than by health education alone. The authors contend that disgust is a potent motivator that can be used in public health campaigns to promote better hygiene practices, particularly in prevention of disease transmission. The study underscores the significance of comprehending emotional drivers like disgust in designing more successful health interventions.

Curtis, V., & Cairncross, S. (2003). Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 3(5), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00606-6 U3214564 (discusscontribs) 08:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback and Suggestions

[edit source]

Hey Jack, I really like your book chapter so far! I found this article from Miller in 2020 which covers motivation to enact hygienic practices in the early stages of the COVID‐19 outbreak. I think this would be an interesting topic to explore and touch on within your book chapter. This article focusses primarily on the role of human behaviour in the COVID-19 outbreak and the speed of the spread across the world, and how human hygiene motivation was associated with the progression.

Here is the reference to the article: Gibson Miller, J. (2020). Capability, opportunity, and motivation to enact hygienic practices in the early stages of the COVID‐19 outbreak in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(4), 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12426

Good luck! :)

- Alyssia

Alyssia Myers (discusscontribs) 11:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Jack, it looks like you are hard at work on your page, I've adding another figure to your page, hopefully it'll help you flesh out your article !!this is the image, you could use it to talk about personal hygiene, such as washing one's hands !!! Good luck Gabriel Geld (discusscontribs) 08:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded; casing has been corrected
  2. I've abbreviated the sub-title (same meaning)
  1. Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
  1. Consider abbreviating the two introductory sections (2 and 3) into a single section; it is OK to retain but keep these sections relatively brief, with embedded links to further information so that the chapter concentrates on psychological science
  2. Remove trailing colons
  3. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
  1. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section
  2. Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest
  3. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  4. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  5. Use sentence casing (Hygiene -> hygiene)
  6. Move quiz into a subsequent section
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with limited use of relevant citations
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
  3. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Caption citations should refer to Figure rather than figure (APA style)
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Insufficient
  2. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  3. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  1. See also
    1. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Not developed
  1. Used effectively
  2. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. At least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. The links to evidence can be improved (i.e., be more direct/accurate). For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply