Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Eudaimonia

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for sentence casing. For example, the wikitext should be:

== Cats and mice ==

rather than

== Cats and Mice ==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Created
  2. Minimal
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Summarised with direct link(s) to evidence.

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Top-level headings are appropriate.
  2. Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development.
  3. See earlier comment about Heading casing.
  4. I'm not convinced that Maslow's hierarchy of needs is amongst the top/most relevant theories relating to this topic, although self-actualisation definitely warrants mention. Perhaps consider looking more closely at Seligman and colleagues' work on happiness and eudaimonia.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an image.
    2. an example or case study.
  2. Remove or adapt generic template content.
  3. Basic development of key points for some sections, with relevant citations.
  4. Theory is stronger - there less evidence that there is a good familiarity with relevant research.
  5. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations.
  6. Historical context is relevant, but also ensure that the chapter covers contemporary understanding of relevant theory and research.
  7. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  8. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  9. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed.

Image[edit source]

  1. An image (figure) is presented.
  2. Caption
    1. uses APA style.
    2. explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text.

References[edit source]

  1. Good.
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation

Resources[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. External links - include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]