Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Empathy and forgiveness

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a basic chapter.
  2. The chapter has been reinstated after being blanked out following submission.
  3. This chapter is well under the maximum word count.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are described in a basic way.
  2. More theoretical depth could be provided.

Research[edit source]

  1. Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
  2. Some relevant research is reviewed in a basic way and discussed in relation to theory.
  3. When describing important research findings, including the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is not at a professional level.
    2. Obtaining (earlier) comments on a chapter plan and/or chapter draft could have helped to improve the chapter.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured.
  3. Learning features
    1. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words would make the text more interactive.
    2. Embedding interwiki links links to other book chapters would help to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    3. Basic use of images.
    4. No use of tables.
    5. No use of feature boxes.
    6. No use of case studies or examples.
  4. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
    2. Use serial commas[1] - it is part of APA style.
    3. A space is needed after a full-stop.
    4. Use single-spaces rather double-spaces between words.
    5. Check and correct use of that vs. who.
  5. Spelling
    1. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour; fulfillment vs. fulfilment).
  6. Proofreading
    1. More proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard.
  7. APA style
    1. Direct quotes need page numbers.
    2. Refer to each Table and each Figure at least once within the main text.
    3. Citations are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. A space is needed before brackets containing a citation
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation.
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation.
      3. See new doi format.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)