Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Changes for 2024

[edit source]

The original 2023 guidelines have been revised in 2024 to make it clearer that any genAI-based text must:

  • clearly and transparently provide genAI acknowledgement in the edit summary, with a link to the chatbot conversation or model and prompt details
  • be fact-checked
  • include appropriate peer-reviewed citation

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Literature searching

[edit source]

I find this page useful but sometimes, I still prefer to find my sources through books and medical journals rather than use the help of Gen AI. Eva U3259916 (discusscontribs) 05:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Eva U3259916: For a thorough literature search, prioritise search of academic journal databases. Google Scholar provides very useful search. GenAI may be helpful for cross-checking and seeing whether it suggests any key literature that was missed during database searching. However, I would caution against relying on genAI as the primary tool for academic literature searching. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposal for rewriting this article

[edit source]

The following is my proposed draft In its entirety: “Don’t.” Dronebogus (discusscontribs) 20:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why? SJ+ 23:12, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I don’t need to explain why generative AI is bad. It’s already been done many, many times. Our sister project is a good place to start. My “draft” is hyperbole, but it gets the point across. Dronebogus (discusscontribs) 00:14, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wiki x AI preconference day @ Wikimania

[edit source]

There will be a preconference day at Wikimania about Wiki AI. It will be mostly offline, but there will be at least one hybrid session for demos of community-developed AI tools and workflows.

  • If you've built something cool, that is a chance to show it off, list it on the gallery of tools in progress, and get feedback.
  • If you could ask the people shaping AI on the wikis (WMF, tool builders, model trainers, GLAM and policy folks) a question, what would it be?

Cheers, SJ+ 23:12, 20 June 2026 (UTC) and AlaexisReply