Talk:Evidence-based assessment/Vignettes/Tamika

Below is a list of sections that currently have no content, but can be added in the future.

Extended content
History of presenting problem[edit | edit source] Conceptualization[edit | edit source] Initial treatment plan[edit | edit source]

Extended content
Select more specialized scales to refine probabilities[edit | edit source] Updating probabilities[edit | edit source] Critical items[edit | edit source]

Prediction phase[edit | edit source]

Cognitive and achievement testing[edit | edit source] (Not done as part of the evaluation; may be able to match up information later)

Cross-informant perspectives[edit | edit source]

Mention that these have DLRs. Also unpack the implications of agreement and disagreement for the client (and add a section about treatment implications of disagreement on the Conceptual Model Pages)

Prescription phase[edit | edit source]

Mental status and clinical observations[edit | edit source]

(add content)

Process phase[edit | edit source]

Clinically significant change[edit | edit source]

Reliable change index[edit | edit source]

Pick a treatment target and specify what the RCI would be for it. Discuss how you would explain to Tamika.

Given Tamika's main diagnosis with a combination of a major depressive episode and a prior dysthymia, bringing down her depressive symptoms back

Nomothetic benchmarks[edit | edit source]

A, B, Cs of Jacobson definitions. General stuff about limitations would go on the main concept page. Here it is focused on the client -- what are the benchmarks they will focus on? How explained to them?

Minimum important difference (MID)[edit | edit source]

Note that this section is a dangler -- not originally called out in the 12 steps. Medium d as a rule of thumb from Streiner, Norman, & Cairney (2015). Could work from AUC to d to raw units as a way of estimating, since psychology hasn't done research on this yet. Might be able to back into it with studies that had CSQ and outcome data.

Client goals & tracking[edit | edit source]

These would be personal goals and idiographic measurement -- YTOPS, etc.

Process measures[edit | edit source]

This would be traces such as coming to sessions, doing homework assignments. (Not sure of other specifics involved in current IPT protocols?)

Progress measures[edit | edit source]

YTOPS again and goal setting.

Termination planning and maintenance[edit | edit source]

Revisit Jacobson benchmarks. Is there much chance of relapse? What things would the client need to pay attention to if they were going to nip that in the bud

The prediction phase and prescription phase has information in it about Arlene and not Tamika, I would consider updating this with the correct information! Emileekruchten (discuss • contribs) 18:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)