Talk:Evaluating Evidence

Please course feedback here. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (discuss • contribs) 14:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Corroborating Evidence and Falsifying Evidence

Add a section that discusses the roles of Corroborating Evidence and Falsifying Evidence. Use the term Corroborating Evidence in appropriate places throughout the course. --Lbeaumont (discuss • contribs) 15:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Lee,

There are things that are felt and do not have any trace of physical evidence.

When humanity invented language they gave names to all that was in existence.Apart from the physical stuff humanity also identified the non physical things and started giving them names.

Those things were in existence and humanity named them.The relationships, feelings, emotions etc. As humanity wandered in the jungles there were only existential real things.

But as they learnt agriculture and had to settle humanity started creating situations where the absence of the feelings and emotions could be felt and realised.

These absence was given a name.Over centuries now humanity believes that they by themselves have an existence. Examples can be things like delusion,myth,hatred etc.

We can not find physical evidence either for love or hatred. We can by logical thinking evaluate that love exists and is a reality and hatred does not exist and it is just absence of love.

How we will include this in the syllabus of evidence is a challenge and will need some brainstorming. Coexistencial-Reality (discuss • contribs) 03:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)