Talk:Ethical Management of the English Language Wikiversity

question

I would like to know how the text in the Notes section relates to the subject of this project. At first glance it appeared to be vandalism... --mikeu ^talk 13:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I just noticed the redirect. Never mind. --mikeu ^talk 14:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

{ec} They were notes to myself - translated:

Daniel Brandt Vandal Impostor

Good faith was assumed of a penis vandal, but not of a vested contributor. Why does the project lack strong controls to prevent vandals from creating damage?

Wikiversity mainly used by parties as a revenge tool

Meta pages used as ways to "get" opponents.

Thought experiment - could I create a project on "how to get away with murder/rape" and compare it to the conduct of contributors to the encyclopedia - why or why not?

However, I support the project created by CM, and have redirected this there, relinquishing the space if someone feels like developing this project. Salmon of Doubt 14:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)