Talk:Esperanto/Root chart

Pervious method:

1. Add the words from Word index (eta 1 mo)
   • do not include proper nouns
   • do not include compound words
2. categorize roots as (eta +1 mo)
   • 100 basic (excluding pronouns, correlatives, numbers, and affixes) (required for basic Esperanto communication: basic body parts, basic actions basic emotions, colors, ect)
   • 500 standard (required for Esperanto fluency)
   • X advanced (requiring knowledge of a scientific genre)
3. complete the chart using words from the English language (eta +2 mo)

Due to further research and seeing a vast number of different dictionaries, yet still existing a need for it to be tabled I have decided to use [1]'s dictionary. for step 1. It will be more efficient (easier & left with a sort-able list/dataset....) to make a script to pull the relevant english information out so until that's complete this table is on hold Ceneezer (discuss • contribs) 07:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Once complete this vocabulary will be named the New Revised Standard Edition (NRSV) Eperanto

A pronoun set for scientific/advanced roots will be created using û:

ûa

Art

ûaz

Astronomy

ûab

Biology

ûac

Chemistry

ûag

Ecology

ûam

Mathematics

ûap

Physics

Issues

There’re still a few issues with the list as given. The minor of these are:

• the “prepositions” table is way too wide to read it conveniently, especially for those who use larger font sizes or smaller screens (as in: handhelds);
• the links like [[w:acidify]] lead to no where; contrast them to, say [[wikt:acidify#English]]!
• similarly, the “suffixes” table may have links to, say [[wikt:-ul-#Esperanto]], etc.;
• (JFTR) the [[w:]] links doesn’t seem to be all that useful, and are just a visual clutter.

Then, there’re a couple of more significant ones:

• the articles in Wikipedias (and Esperanta Vikipedio isn’t an exception) are named after concepts, and these are generally expressed as words or combinations of words; I could hardly imagine an article with a bare root as its title! therefore, the [[w:eo:abat]] approach is unlikely to work well (if at all);
• and why exactly is this project not carried on Wiktionary? They seem to already have a whole lot categories related to la lingvo internacia, such as, say, words approved by the Akademio de Esperanto or Esperanto male roots.

Hope the above could be a nice thing to ponder on.

— Ivan Shmakov (d ▞ c) 10:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

New website not working

When trying to access the URL http://home.ceneezer.com/esperanto/, I receive the following error message:

You don't have permission to access /esperanto/ on this server.