Should animal testing be legal?
|
This Wikiversity page is inactive and has been retained for historical interest. Should you wish to revive discussion regarding the subject, you may try using the talk page or start a new discussion at the Wikiversity:Colloquium. |
 | After a community review discussing Wikidebates and its inclusion within Wikiversity, the project has been discontinued due to a lack of moderation and policy implementation. Please open a new Wikiversity:Community Review to re-open the project. No new arguments or debates will be included. Any new additions will be reverted. |
 |
Subject classification: this is a medicine resource. |
 |
Subject classification: this is a law learning projects resource. |
We made several important medical discoveries due to animal testing, but is it morally correct? Do the means justify the ends when we cause suffering and death to non-human animals? We usually value human life above all others (speciesism) but are there any limits on what costs are worth the benefits to us?
By animal testing we mean experimentation with non-human animals for the purpose of scientific research.
Animal testing should be legal
[edit | edit source]Pro
[edit | edit source]
Pro Animal testing helps researchers find cures and treatments for human and non-human diseases. As humans we should value other humans above animals and reduce harm to humans.
Objection To value humans over other animals constitutes speciesism, and that is morally incorrect.
Con
[edit | edit source]
Con Animals are not mere objects for humans to treat as we please, they do not consent to participate in experiments in which they may suffer or die, and we have no right to force them to do so.
- Objection Why cannot we force animals to participate? Is there anything that animals do consent to? Is it possible to know their consent? Using this line of logic, humans would also have no right to force them into servitude as pets.
- Objection There is a big difference between 'forcing' an animal to be a pet and experimenting on them. First of all, being a pet is in most cases the best possible life for a being, while experimenting is quite the opposite.
- Con Using animals as a model for diseases or drug responses in humans can be unreliable, leading to experiments that cause animal suffering without helpful results to justify them.
See also
[edit | edit source]Notes and references
[edit | edit source]External links
[edit | edit source]- Should animal testing be banned?, largest structured arguments tree on this subject on Kialo