Should animal testing be legal?
Appearance
This resource is a wikidebate, a collaborative effort to gather and organize all arguments on a given issue. It is a tool of argument analysis or pro-and-con analysis. This is not a place to defend your preferred points of view, but original arguments are allowed and welcome. See the Wikidebate guidelines for more.
Subject classification: this is a medicine resource. |
Subject classification: this is a law learning projects resource. |
We made several important medical discoveries due to animal testing, but is it morally correct? Do the means justify the ends when we cause suffering and death to non-human animals? We usually value human life above all others (speciesism) but are there any limits on what costs are worth the benefits to us?
By animal testing we mean experimentation with non-human animals for the purpose of scientific research.
Animal testing should be legal
[edit | edit source]Pro
[edit | edit source]- Pro Animal testing helps researchers find cures and treatments for human and non-human diseases. As humans we should value other humans above animals and reduce harm to humans.
- Objection To value humans over other animals constitutes speciesism, and that is morally incorrect.
Con
[edit | edit source]- Con Animals are not mere objects for humans to treat as we please, they do not consent to participate in experiments in which they may suffer or die, and we have no right to force them to do so.
- Objection Why cannot we force animals to participate? Is there anything that animals do consent to? Is it possible to know their consent? Using this line of logic, humans would also have no right to force them into servitude as pets.
- Objection There is a big difference between 'forcing' an animal to be a pet and experimenting on them. First of all, being a pet is in most cases the best possible life for a being, while experimenting is quite the opposite.
- Objection Why cannot we force animals to participate? Is there anything that animals do consent to? Is it possible to know their consent? Using this line of logic, humans would also have no right to force them into servitude as pets.
- Con Using animals as a model for diseases or drug responses in humans can be unreliable, leading to experiments that cause animal suffering without helpful results to justify them.
See also
[edit | edit source]Notes and references
[edit | edit source]External links
[edit | edit source]- Should animal testing be banned?, largest structured arguments tree on this subject on Kialo