Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and emotion/Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) vs. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy(CBT)

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance and Committment therapy (ACT) vs.Cognitive Behavioral Therapy(CBT)

Throughout the research is has become apparent that the difference between cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and ACT needs to be addressed.
The main difference is in how each therapy approaches behavior, ACT is more accepting of the distress and views the context in which behaviour is occurs to be problematic. Rather than, CBT which views emotions as dysfunctional and behaviour itself as problematic, with the intent to change cognition surrounding the problem. Both are goal directed and action focused as well as empirically based.
Relapse in anxiety disordered patients Acceptance
Views cognition as faulty cognitive defusion
Modifies content of cognition contact with the present moment
Focused on changing maladaptive behaviour self as context
Goal and problem focused self-directed values
Action orientated committed action

Arch, Eifert, Davies, Vilardaga, Rose & Craske, (2012). Hayes et al., 2013; Twohig,(2012)

References[edit | edit source]

Arch, J. J., Eifert, G. H., Davies, C., Vilardaga, J. C. P., Rose, R. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012). Randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for mixed anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 750-765. Doi: 10.1037/a0028310

Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioural science: Examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioural and cognitive therapy. Behaviour Therapy, 44, 180-198. Doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.002

Twohig, M. P. (2012). Introduction: the basis of acceptance and commitment therapy. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 19, 499-507. Doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.04.003