MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Archives

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

lenr-canr.org[edit source]

This site was blacklisted at meta based on primarily on allegations that the site is fringe and therefore not reliable source, which, even if it were true, does not apply on Wikiversity. There was no spam of the type that ordinarily justifies blacklisting, and other claims that were made there were not supported in later discussion. On en.wikipedia, almost every whitelist request has been granted, see [1]. Lenr-canr.org is a web archive of papers related to Cold fusion, often peer-reviewed, mostly published elsewhere, for which permission has been obtained. This is a critical resource for the study of this field. I have added one page to the list of books for Cold fusion, lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf, and I give below what I believe is the regex to whitelist the entire site or just the one page.

\blenr-canr\.com\b
\blenr-canr\.org/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat\.pdf\b

Thanks. --Abd 14:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- darklama  14:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

bestwalkingshoesforwomen.org[edit source]

The link that I want whitelisted in section title, === bestwalkingshoesforwomen.org === The page that I want to use the link on https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%90i_b%E1%BB%99 Because I added more guide to explain in that article, and the content in that article I used and translated from this website === bestwalkingshoesforwomen.org ===. Quachan888 (discusscontribs) 05:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

N Not done This whitelist is for en.wikiversity only. Request may be in order on wikipedia:vi:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. I could not find the regex code in m:Spam blacklist that triggers on this, but it is obviously there, see [2]. (not a custodian) --Abd (discusscontribs) 14:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
N Not done -The proposed article is not a Wikiversity article. You'll need to request whitelisting on the wiki where the article is located. -- Dave Braunschweig (discusscontribs) 14:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Second time I've seen an edit conflict with you, Dave, where I saved after you but the software added both with no warning (i.e., I did not get an edit conflict message). You must be doing something wrong. :-) --Abd (discusscontribs) 14:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)