Jump to content

Linear algebra (Osnabrück 2024-2025)/Part I/Lecture 27/refcontrol

From Wikiversity

In the last lecture, we have introduced generalized eigenspaces for an eigenvalue of an endomorphism as the kernel of for a sufficient large exponent . This means in particular that, if we restrict to the corresponding generalized eigenspace, then a certain power of it is the zero mapping. Here, we study in general endomorphisms with the property that some power of it is zero.



Nilpotent mappings

Let be a field,MDLD/field and let be a -vector space.MDLD/vector space A linear mappingMDLD/linear mapping

is called nilpotent, if there exists a natural number such that the -th compositionMDLD/composition fulfills


A square matrixMDLD/square matrix is called nilpotent, if there exists a natural number such that the -th matrix productMDLD/matrix product fulfills


== Example Example 27.3

change==

Let be an upper triangular matrixMDLD/upper triangular matrix with the property that all diagonal entries are . Thus, has the form

Then is nilpotent,MDLD/nilpotent (matrix) with every power the -diagonal is moved one step up and to the right. If, for example, the product of the -th row and the -th column with

is computed, then there is always a in the partial products and, altogether, the result is .


A special case of Example 27.3 is the matrix

An important observation is that under this mapping, is sent to , is sent to , and , finally, is sent to , which is sent to . The -th power of the matrix sends to and is not the zero matrix, but the -th power of the matrix is the zero matrix.


Let denote a field,MDLD/field and let denote a -vector spaceMDLD/vector space of finite dimension. Let

be a linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping For an eigenvalueMDLD/eigenvalue , the generalized eigenspaceMDLD/generalized eigenspace has the property that the restriction of to is nilpotent.MDLD/nilpotent (linear)


Let denote a finite-dimensional vector space over a field . Let

be a

linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping Then the following statements are equivalent.
  1. is nilpotent.MDLD/nilpotent (endomorphism)
  2. For every vector , there exists an such that
  3. There exists a basisMDLD/basis (vs) of and a such that

    for .

  4. There exists a generating systemMDLD/generating system (vs) of and a such that

    for .

From (1) to (2) is clear. From (2) to (3). Let be a basis (or a finite generating system), and let be such that

Then

fulfills the property for every generator. From (3) to (4) is clear. From (4) to (1). For , we have

Due to the linearity of , we have

therefore,



LemmaLemma 27.7 change

Let denote a field,MDLD/field and let denote a -vector spaceMDLD/vector space of finite dimension. Let

be a

linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping Then the following statements are equivalent.
  1. is nilpotentMDLD/nilpotent (linear)
  2. The minimal polynomialMDLD/minimal polynomial (linear) of is a power of .
  3. The characteristic polynomialMDLD/characteristic polynomial of is a power of .

The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows immediately from the definition, the equivalence of (2) and (3) follows from Lemma 24.5 .



Let be a fieldMDLD/field and let denote a finite-dimensionalMDLD/finite-dimensional (vs) -vector space.MDLD/vector space Let

be a nilpotentMDLD/nilpotent (endomorphism) linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping Then is

trigonalizable.MDLD/trigonalizable There exists a basis such that is described, with respect to this basis, by an upper triangular matrix, in which all diagonal entries are .

This follows directly from Lemma 27.7 and Theorem 25.10 .



The Jordan decomposition of a nilpotent endomorphism

For a nilpotent endomorphismMDLD/nilpotent endomorphism on a vector spaceMDLD/vector space , we have

hence, there is just one generalized eigenspace,MDLD/generalized eigenspace and this is the total space. We will show that we can improve the describing matrix even further (not just having triangular form).   In the next lecture, we will apply these improvements to all generalized eigenspaces of a trigonalizable endomorphism, in order to achieve the so-called Jordan normal form.


A matrix of the form

with has, with respect the basis and , the form


LemmaLemma 27.10 change

Let be a fieldMDLD/field and let denote a finite-dimensionalMDLD/finite-dimensional (vs) -vector space.MDLD/vector space Let

be a nilpotentMDLD/nilpotent (endomorphism) linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping Let

and suppose that is minimal with this property. Then, between the linear subspaces

the relation

holds, and the inclusions

are strict for

.

Let . Then, the containment is equivalent with . This gives the first claim. For the second claim, assume that

holds for some . By applying , we get

In this way, we obtain

contradicting the minimality of .



LemmaLemma 27.11 change

Let be a fieldMDLD/field and let denote a finite-dimensionalMDLD/finite-dimensional (vs) -vector space.MDLD/vector space Let

be a nilpotentMDLD/nilpotent (endomorphism) linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping Then there exists a basisMDLD/basis (vs) of with

or

Let and suppose that is minimal with this property. We consider the linear subspaces

Let be a direct complement for , therefore,

Because of Lemma 27.10 , we have

and

Therefore, there exists a linear subspace of with

and with

In this way, we obtain linear subspaces such that

and

Morover,

since we refine the preceding direct sum decomposition in every step. Also, , restricted to[1] with is injective. For , it follows

by the directness of the composition. We construct now a basis with the claimed properties. For this, we choose a basis of . We can extend the (linearly independent) image to get a basis of , and so forth. The union of these bases is then a basis of . The basis element of for are sent by construction to other basis elements, and the basis elements of are sent to . To get an ordering, we choose a basis element from , together with all its successive images, then we choose another basis element of , together with all its successive images, until the is exhausted. Then we work with in the same way. In the last step, we swap the ordering of the basis elements just constructed.



Let be a fieldMDLD/field and let denote a finite-dimensionalMDLD/finite-dimensional (vs) -vector space.MDLD/vector space Let

be a nilpotentMDLD/nilpotent (endomorphism) linear mapping.MDLD/linear mapping Then there exists a basisMDLD/basis (vs) of such that describing matrix, with respect to this basis, has the form

where equals or . That is, can be brought into Jordan normal form.

This follows directly from Lemma 27.11 .


For a nilpotent mapping on a two-dimensional vector space , we either have the zero mapping, or a nilpotent mapping with an one-dimensional kernel. In this case, we obtain man for every element a basis (in this ordering), such that the describing matrix has the form . When the dimension is larger,we get more and more complex possibilities. We discuss some typical examples in dimension three.


We want to apply Lemma 27.11 to

We have

and

Therefore,

We have

so that wir can choose

We have

Hence,

with

Finally,

Therefore,

is a basis with the intended properties.

The inverse matrix to

is

therefore,


We want to apply Lemma 27.11 to

We have

Therefore,

We have

so that we can choose

We have

Therefore,

Hence,

is a basis as looked for. With respect to this basis, the linear mapping is described by the matrix


We want to apply Lemma 27.11 to

We have

Therefore,

We have

so that we can choose

We have

Therefore,

Hence,

is a looked-for basis. With respect to this basis, the linear mapping is described by the matrix



Footnotes
  1. Restriction as a mapping to ; the are in general not -invariant.


<< | Linear algebra (Osnabrück 2024-2025)/Part I | >>
PDF-version of this lecture
Exercise sheet for this lecture (PDF)