Deshawn[edit | edit source]
Clinical description[edit | edit source]
Deshawn is a 7 year old African American male attending regular education in the second grade. He lives with his mother and two younger brothers. His mother scheduled the appointment because of concerns about explosive violence toward family members and pets.
History of presenting problem[edit | edit source]
Deshawn's mother works as a psychiatric nurse, and describes him as always being high energy and on the go, and teachers have described him as being a handful from preschool on. He frequently is out of his seat, running around, messing with other children’s hair or belongings, and acting out in ways that may be seeking attention. However, the reason that the family is coming for an evaluation is because Deshawn can get explosively violent. Mom describes him chasing the family cat with scissors and cutting an inch and a half off of his tail. When mom tried to get the scissors away, he chased her with them. He got enraged arguing with his younger brother about playing a videogame, and snapped his brother’s wrist, requiring an emergency room visit and a cast. However, he is not always like that, and frequently can be loving and affectionate. Mom describes him as having “spells” where his mood and energy seem clearly different from normal, and everyone has learned to “tiptoe on eggshells” around him when he gets in those states, because his mood swings can be so strong. She says that the feel of the house changes to become like she’s working on the hospital unit. She is worried because Deshawn’s father has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. She reports that the father has been taking a combination of lithium and divalproex for several years, and he appears to be doing well on the combination. She has heard that bipolar disorder runs in families, and she is worried that it might be what is starting with Deshawn.
Conceptualization[edit | edit source]
Initial treatment plan[edit | edit source]
Assessment findings[edit | edit source]
Checklist scores[edit | edit source]
Deshawn's mother and his teacher completed the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) checklists. Deshawn is too young to read the questions, so we don't have Youth Self Report scores (where the normative data starts at age 11). Here are the results, reported as T scores (M = 50, standard deviation (SD) = 10, compared to other males between 11 and 18 years of age).
**Interpret parent and teacher reports.
Select more specialized scales to refine probabilities[edit | edit source]
Updating probabilities[edit | edit source]
Critical items[edit | edit source]
Diagnostic interview findings[edit | edit source]
Diagnoses are based on a LEAD (longitudinal expert evaluation of all data) consensus meeting following a Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) interview, using DSM-IV criteria.
- Cyclothymic Disorder (65% confidence)
- Conduct Disorder (90% confidence)
- ADHD NOS (65% confidence)
- Enuresis (100% confidence)
- Rule out: sexual abuse (20% confidence)
Cognitive and achievement testing[edit | edit source]
(Not done as part of the evaluation; may be able to match up information later)
Let's see how we would apply the EBA principles to Deshawn:
Shortlist of probable hypotheses[edit | edit source]
Based on Deshawn's age and the common clinical issues, here are the possible issues:
- A mood disorder definitely is a leading hypothesis. The suicide attempt also suggests evaluating for a mood disorder (although not everyone who attempts suicide has a mood disorder). Within the "mood" category, the hypotheses should consider major depression, dysthymia, and bipolar spectrum disorders, as well as other medical issues that could lead to mood symptoms.
- Conduct problems would be a fourth -- they are not immediately suggested by the description of the presenting problem, but they are common in Deshawn's age group, and they also can be a risk factor for self harm.
- Attention problems are worth evaluating based on prevalence, though her prior academic performance does not suggest any additional reason for concern.
**The info here is about another vignette...fill in info for Deshawn.
Deshawn's sex and age decrease the probability of a mood disorder, and he is young to already have developed a conduct disorder.
Below is a worksheet with the DLRs left blank to be filled in. Answers are below.
|DeShawn||Common Dx Hypotheses (A)||Starting Prob. (B)||Broad Measure (D)||Cross-informant (E)||Confirmation (G)||Treatment Phase (I), (J), (K)|
|Base Rate from Rettew et al. (2009) SDI||Scale & Score||DLR||Revised Prob.||EAY Check||Next Test score||DLR||Revised Prob.||K-SADS Interview|
|Any Anxiety||Specific Phobia||0.19|
|Other measures are better than Achenbach|
|Any Impulse Control Disorder||ODD||0.13||CBCL T
|No data about TRF scales for aggressive|
|Conduct d/o (90%)|
|ADHD nos (65%)|
|Any Mood Disorder||MDD||0.12||CBCL T
|Haven't found data about TRF for internalizing|
|BP||0.03||Cyclothymic d/o (65%)|
|Any Substance Abuse Disorder||0.11||CBCL #2
CBCL #99 CBCL #105
Mention that these have DLRs. Also unpack the implications of agreement and disagreement for the client (and add a section about treatment implications of disagreement on the Conceptual Model Pages)
Mental status and clinical observations[edit | edit source]
Genogram and family functioning[edit | edit source]
Here is a genogram of Deshawn's family:
*** Write out what Deshawn's mother chose, synchronizing with slides from 2017 Miami/Indianapolis***
Reliable change index[edit | edit source]
Pick a treatment target and specify what the RCI would be for it. Discuss how you would explain to Deshawn and his mother
Nomothetic benchmarks[edit | edit source]
A, B, Cs of Jacobson definitions. General stuff about limitations would go on the main concept page. Here it is focused on the client -- what are the benchmarks they will focus on? How explained to them?
Interpreting benchmarks[edit | edit source]
Minimum important difference (MID)[edit | edit source]
Note that this section is a dangler -- not originally called out in the 12 steps. Medium d as a rule of thumb from Streiner, Norman, & Cairney (2015). Could work from AUC to d to raw units as a way of estimating, since psychology hasn't done research on this yet. Might be able to back into it with studies that had CSQ and outcome data.
Client goals & tracking[edit | edit source]
These would be personal goals and idiographic measurement -- YTOPS, etc.
This would be traces such as coming to sessions, doing homework assignments. (Not sure of other specifics involved in current IPT protocols?)
YTOPS again and goal setting.
Revisit Jacobson benchmarks. Is there much chance of relapse? What things would the client need to pay attention to if they were going to nip that in the bud?
References[edit | edit source]
- Rettew, David C.; Lynch, Alicia Doyle; Achenbach, Thomas M.; Dumenci, Levent; Ivanova, Masha Y. (2009-09-01). "Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews". International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 18 (3): 169–184. doi:10.1002/mpr.289. ISSN 1557-0657. PMID 19701924. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19701924.