Complex Analysis/Cauchy Integral Theorem
Introduction
[edit | edit source]The Cauchy integral theorem is one of the central results of Complex Analysis. It exists in various versions, and in this article, we aim to present a basic one for convex regions and a relatively general one for nullhomologous cycles.
For Convex Regions
[edit | edit source]Statement
[edit | edit source]Let be a convex region, and let be a closed rectifiable curve Trace of Curve in . Then, for every holomorphic function , the following holds:
Proof 1: Antiderivatives of f
[edit | edit source]First, we observe that has a antiderivative in . Fix a point . For any point , let denote the straight-line segment connecting and as path.
Proof 2: Definition of the Antiderivative
[edit | edit source]Define by:
- .
Due to the convexity of , the triangle with vertices lies entirely within for .
Proof 3: Application of Goursat’s Lemma
[edit | edit source]By Goursat's Lemma for the boundary of a triangle with vertices , we have:
Proof 4: Conclusion Using Goursat's Lemma
[edit | edit source]This leads to:
Thus, we have:
Proof 5: Limit Process
[edit | edit source]Since is continuous in , taking the limit as gives:
Proof 5: Differentiability of
[edit | edit source]Therefore, is continuous, and is differentiable in , with:
Since was arbitrary, we conclude , proving that has a antiderivative.
Proof 6: Path Integration
[edit | edit source]Now, let be a piecewise continuously differentiable, closed curve. Then:
Proof 7:
[edit | edit source]Let be an arbitrary integration path in , and let . As shown here, we choose a polygonal path such that , , and
Since polygonal paths are piecewise continuously differentiable, the above result implies . Consequently,
As was arbitrary, the claim follows.
For Cycles in Arbitrary Open Sets
[edit | edit source]In arbitrary open sets, one must ensure that cycles do not enclose singularities or poles in the complement of the domain. Enclosing such singularities may contribute a non-zero value to the integral (e.g., the function and in a domain . Even though is holomorphic in , the integral is not zero but (see nullhomologous cycle).
Statement
[edit | edit source]Let be open, and let be a nullhomologous cycle in . Then, for every holomorphic function , the following holds:
Proof
[edit | edit source]Let , and define by
Then, is holomorphic, and by the global integral formula, we have:
See Also
[edit | edit source]Page Information
[edit | edit source]You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides
Wiki2Reveal
[edit | edit source]The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.
- This page is designed as a PanDocElectron-SLIDE document type.
- Source: Wikiversity https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Complex%20Analysis/Cauchy%20Integral%20Theorem
- see Wiki2Reveal for the functionality of Wiki2Reveal.
Translation and Version Control
[edit | edit source]This page was translated based on the following von Cauchy Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:
- Source: Integralsatz von Cauchy - URL: https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Integralsatz_von_Cauchy
- Date: 12/18/2024