Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519

Demonstration

This revision=20070519162600

Argument: To start a thread, go to a page in a namespace with subpage function, and enter

[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=purge}} Purge]
{{subst:wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/preload}}

To archive a thread, go to the subpage /archive of the thread, and

{{subst:{{subst:NAMESPACE}}:{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}|subst=subst:}}

To reply, press the external link "reply".
To edit an existing (sub)thread, press "Edit" next to the section header.

Compare: Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst with depth --Hillgentleman|Talk 16:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[1]

Questions? Comments?

NavHead

This revision=20070519163246

Argument:

--Hillgentleman|Talk 16:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[2]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519163246

Testing the "external link"

Testing thread

This revision=20070519101448

Argument:I'm guessing that my comment goes here.

--JWSchmidt 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-introducing the thread

This revision=20070519181349

Argument: adding a thread to a deadend.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here" [3]

A one-liner may go here.

NavHead

This revision=20070519182021

Argument: The script is becoming too small.

Here we can elaborate! --Hillgentleman|Talk 18:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[4]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519182021

Perhaps I should change "argument" to "comment".

NavHead

This revision=20070519182319

Argument: But I still like argument!

--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[5]

Done Argument -->comment. Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/preload

NavHead

This revision=20070519182832

Comment:

--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[6]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519182832

Testing sections

Can there be sections within threads? --JWSchmidt 17:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[7]

A one liner may go here.

NavHead

This revision=20070519172843

~~Argument: Here we can elaborate....~~

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[8]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519172843

Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose.

NavHead

This revision=20070519173345

Argument: BASEPAGENAME/1/1/1/1/1... can only produce a linear structure.

Originally I tried REVISIONID, which didn't work: if we substitute a revisionid, we get blank. --Hillgentleman|Talk 17:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[9]

Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519173345

And try not to create your own section.

NavHead

This revision=20070519173646

Argument: Use the "reply link" to create a new section, or else you would create a dead end.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[10]

I mean,

NavHead

This revision=20070519174254

Argument:

My "A one-liner may go here" is a reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here." and "Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose." replies "Can there be sections within treads". But that latter section was created articficailly (without pressing the "reply button") and so it hijacked the reply link to the previous comment. Or we can say, two different comments (and two different replies) were merged. That makes the questions and answers crossed. So it is a little confusing.

In short, Don't create your own section. Use the "reply" link. Once you have created a section, you are free to edit your previous comments, correct mistakes, etc.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]