Copyleft licensing determines all actions, processes and outputs as pieces that can be copied and recombined. Also reinforces the prominence of contributors and his work.
Support It was all more clear before the Creative Commons license adoption, since the same software-based license was useful for the purposes of the free encyclopaedia. --Esenabre 13:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Comment Not sure with teh following, can someone verify please? I think Wikipedia copied much of its content back then from an encyclopedia (Britannica?)? Probably it is mentioned somewhere. I assume this was PD? Though I wonder if being so, why this was not credited much more by Wikipedia? ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat 18:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Support It was all more clear before the Creative Commons license adoption, since the same software-based license was useful for the purposes of the free encyclopaedia. --Esenabre 13:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Comment Not sure with teh following, can someone verify please? I think Wikipedia copied much of its content back then from an encyclopedia (Britannica?)? Probably it is mentioned somewhere. I assume this was PD? Though I wonder if being so, why this was not credited much more by Wikipedia? ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat 18:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I disagree because