Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/IKEA effect

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestion[edit source]

@U3209567: Thanks for tackling this topic.

Some initial suggestion:

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feedback[edit source]

Topic Development[edit source]

Outline is looking good so far! In terms of applications you could consider the nature of "open-source" communities, (such as wikis for example ), as a way to facilitate collaboration. Since an individual's name (or profile) is connected to something he/she wrote, they can feel more attached to the work put in.--U3213250 (discusscontribs) 03:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks U3213250,
There is definitely research on the application of collaboration, I don't know if there is anything specific of on Wiki's but its a good suggestion thanks. U3209567 (discusscontribs) 09:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi! This is a super interestng topic and have noticed that you noted some important focus questions. I thought it might be interesting to invstigate this effect specifically on children? I saw that one of your focus question is to investigate how this effect impacts people, maybe you would like to look deeper on the impact it may have on children and why they find it so appealing to build toys/lego. I look forward to reading more about your topic! --MaryamNageeb (discusscontribs) 03:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Children don't come up as much in the research, though I will be making use of study that looks at how IKEA effect impact's Children's vegetable intake. Lego is just used as example because its a) used by the researchers in the original tests, b) it is a good at demonstrating the exact mechanism of the IKEA effect, in that we tend to value the things because they were our creation, rather than because of their ability to meet an "objective standard" c) I am using lego as example cause I grew up building it and understand how to apply it as a conceptual framework for this assignment.
Thanks for the feedback U3209567 (discusscontribs) 03:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I think that you have chosen a really interesting topic to tackle. I also found it very interesting with you mentioning that this specific book chapter could be argued as the IKEA effect, well done!!! I was reading through your chapter and I thought that this study may be of some use to you. I found their results to be very interesting. They talk about the neural basis of the IKEA effect and how attachment and memory play an important role! I hope this helps. < https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1129582/full > --Alice hatcher (discusscontribs) 10:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank's Alice, I found the same chapter and am defiantly going to use it, thanks for your input and encouragement. U3209567 (discusscontribs) 00:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

Headings[edit source]

  1. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic
  2. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  3. Check and correct spelling; remove colon from the end of heading
  4. Consider making the application heading a question
  5. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure

Overview[edit source]

  1. Underway; promising development
  2. Consider starting with building IKEA furniture as the prototypical example/scenario to help engage reader interest in a way that aligns with the title and sub-title. The lego example could be used further into the chapter. Note LEGO -> Lego.
  3. Rename topic questions to focus questions
  4. Include at least one or two citations
  5. Use 3rd person perspective (except perhaps for scenarios/examples)

Key points[edit source]

  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Good balance of theory and research
  3. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well underway

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
  2. Use APA style for figure captions and to cite figures

Learning feature[edit source]

  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s) or tables

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. italicisation

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing
  2. External links
    1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  3. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed
  2. Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box
  3. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  4. Clear focus questions

Theory[edit source]

  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory
  3. Builds reasonably well on related chapters
  4. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  5. Key citations are well used
  6. Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research[edit source]

  1. Excellent review of relevant research
  2. Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  3. Claims are referenced

Integration[edit source]

  1. Excellent integration between theory and research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Excellent summary and conclusion
  2. Key points are well summarised
  3. Summarise key points
  4. Add practical, take-home message(s)

Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
    2. Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
    2. Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
  3. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent
    1. Remove unnecessary capitalisation
  4. APA style
    1. Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.
    2. Write numbers under 10 using words (e.g., five). Express numbers 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 10).
    3. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1)
    4. Citations use correct APA style
    5. References use almost correct APA style - check consistency

Learning features[edit source]

  1. Excellent use of learning features
  2. Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. Very good use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Very good use of image(s)
  5. No use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
    1. Also include links to related book chapters
  9. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~9 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A context for the topic is clearly established through an example

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes basic implied use of relevant psychological research but a more explicit synthesis of relevant research would be useful
  6. The presentation includes citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  8. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A verbal conclusion is provided
  2. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well paced
  4. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  5. Very good intonation
  6. Consider improving articulation to enhance the clarity of speech
  7. The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed
  8. Audio recording quality was very good
  9. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
  10. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) although greater synthesis of research would be ideal
  11. Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  5. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  6. The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but could be improved by incorporating greater synthesis of key research

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. There are some small discrepancies with the book chapter title and sub-title.
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  5. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply