Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Emotion knowledge

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Capitalisation and wording of the title/sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Created (minimal), with link to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with links to evidence Section headings Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development to address how EK can be developed See earlier comment about Heading casing. Avoid providing too much background information about what it is - the challenge here is to cover this relatively briefly and then concentrate on how it can be developed. Key points None provided. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles. Overview - Consider adding focus questions Consider including more examples/case studies. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section. Image None provided. References None provided. Resources None provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Chapter tips

Hi, One thing you can do to make your chapter more interactive is by adding hyperlinks to other Wikipedia pages within your chapter - e.g., hyperlink your 'example emotions' with emotion Wikipedia pages. You could also add in quizzes after long sections to test readers knowledge or case studies to elaborate on complex topics you have covered. Rather than adding 'citations' after sections, use APA referencing when citing other peoples work. Here is a link to the UC APA referencing guide. The in-text citation section is most relevant. U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 03:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings Remove references from headings Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Overview - Consider adding: an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered an image an example or case study Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? Figure A relevant figure is presented Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient chapter Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand This chapter provides useful theoretical material about emotion in general, but could be improved by honing in more specifically on EK For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Overview A more up-front, simpler explanation of EK would be helpful What is the difference between EK and EI? This overview sounds like the focus is on EI? Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Clear focus question(s) Theory – Breadth Basic but sufficient coverage of relevant theory is provided The chapter could be improved by providing a clearer description of EK that contextualises its meaning in terms of its similarities and differences from other related concepts. My sense is that this chapter is more about emotional intelligence than EK? No consideration of developmental theories about how emotion recognition evolves during childhood? Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Good depth is provided about the selected theory(ies), but this could be improved by reducing the emphasis on general emotion theory and increasing the emphasis on the aspects which relate to EK Key citations are well used Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts Research – Key findings Basic overview of relevant research More detail about key EK studies would be ideal Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Basic critical thinking about EK research is evident Integration There is basic integration between EK theory and research Conclusion Basic summary of EK theory and research Add practical, take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Avoid long direct quotes. Write in your own words in order to demonstrate understanding. "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Figures Figures are very well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Tables Table captions should use APA style. See example Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use correct APA style References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[1] Check and correct use of italicisation Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is good Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Two uses of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s) Very good use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Basic use of quiz(zes) The quiz questions could be more effective if they focused more explicitly on EK Basic use of case studies or examples. It would be far more impressive to see your own examples. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Basic use of external links in the "External links" section. Focus on EK. Social contribution ~8 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence Use a numbered list

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is under the maximum time limit, so there was room for further development of the ideas Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is established Focus questions are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation has a basic structure (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory Although emotion knowledge is briefly distinguished from emotional intelligence at the start, this distinction appears to become blurred as the presentation develops until the end, when the Conclusion seems to be at least as much about EI as EK. This distinction could be sharpened. The presentation makes little to no use of relevant psychological research Include citations to support claims The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion A basic Conclusion slide is narrated Consider also presenting text-based summaries of take-home messages Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point Good intonation The presentation lacks some polish that could come with more practice Audio recording quality was very good Video The presentation makes basic use of animated text accompanied by images The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The simultaneous text and image animation makes this presentation challenging to cognitively digest whilst also listening to the idea. Consider what to simplify and what to animate to draw attention for a more effective visual presentation. Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A written description of the presentation is not provided. Providing an informative description can help viewers decide whether they want to watch or not. Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)